the unbiased journalists

It was advertised with scenes from the initial episode, and the trailers said absolutely nothing explicit about it “being a faithful adaptation of the original comic”, so you’re wrong and that’s on you for making assumptions. I mean seriously, real question, did you honestly expect them to come right out and say “Yeah…

My impression is more that many of them are using “betrayal” or similar terms because they feel the creators owed them something, which is a concept I refuse to entertain. Beyond that, the term implies a much more emotional reaction than could ever possibly be warranted. This isn’t O’Malley pretending to be their bff…

Its supposed to be creepy. Scott isn’t good person at the beginning of the book and him stringing a high schooler along was part of his overall shitty persona. If they removed it, they’d be betraying the narrative of Scott eventually growing to become less shitty. One of the criticisms from book fans to the movie was…

The number of people angry that we didn’t get a beat-for-beat retelling of the story we’ve already gotten twice now to one degree or another is... baffling to me. Like I’ve seriously seen people arguing that the advertising should have ‘been more honest about what the show was’, like they were just supposed to give…

Can confirm knives is in it, and the creepiness definitely gets addressed.

It is as satisfying of an ending as both the movie and the comic.

It feels complete. It has one line towards the end that could be taken as “These characters could set up the season two plot” or “These characters are simply back on their bullshit.”

Scott Pilgrim is essentially the comics version of 500 days of Summer. People like it and relate to it for the wrong reasons without understanding the core of the story is that Scott is shitty.

I haven’t played any of the Persona games, but I feel like “the main character isn’t gay” isn’t the same thing as homophobia. Like, I know it’s a role-playing game and he’s the main player character of the game and so ostensibly the role that you are getting to play, but just because you can make a lot of other…

Game’s fine, but not the master class in game design so many Nintendo fans are claiming. Donkey Kong Country Returns, Tropical Freeze, and Rayman Legends are better side-scrollers, and all of them are a decade or more older. I swear Nintendo gets the rose colored treatment every time they release a game.

The games look and run great on anything but Switch. There is no need to re-re-master them. Its just great to have them available on current gen systems. There's no need to add more to them. Metal Gear gains nothing from 'Ultrawide' 

Yes, lets talk about interative mediums, where they are designed to run and be played a particular way and if you tinker with them too much because you obsess over an arbitrary frame rate they break.

I can only assume you get motion sickness going to the theater. 

They hired Bluepoint to do them and the remasters of MGS 2/3 are pretty perfect. This is a direct port of those remasters. 

It seems like you have a very poor understanding of how old games work.

Just going to say this so the cheap seats can hear it.

It mostly looks like free to play garbage yeah, but Rumbleverse looked kinda fun. Never got around to trying it out. 

A slideshow with the top 10 most unnecessary slideshows coming in 3…2…1…

So after going through this slide show, nothing of value or anything that will be missed is going bye bye? Not sure if this required a entire slide show, but okay I guess