It's always controversial to kill off a character, especially when it's as brutal as this. Some people will be fine, others furious. All in all though this was a solid episode that had a couple gut-punching scenes.
It's always controversial to kill off a character, especially when it's as brutal as this. Some people will be fine, others furious. All in all though this was a solid episode that had a couple gut-punching scenes.
Can I just say how refreshing it is to have a character that feels like they are one step ahead of the Underwoods? For the past 4 seasons there hasn't really been a true threat to the Underwoods - it's always some measly reporter or some feckless Congressman. Finally we have someone that 1) does not broadcast her next…
"… someone with a long history of honest and ethical public service…"
That's not anywhere near what I said my expectation was, but OK.
You seem to have a great grasp on the reality of things, especially considering the fact it's been proven that many media organizations colluded with the Clinton campaign. CNN - gave HRC debate questions; asked HRC campaign what they should ask the Republicans at the debate. Politico - allowed HRC campaign to edit…
"Imaginary friend"? There are atheist Democrats?
Who are you talking to? "He's"?
Having a diverse thought pool is not considered "wasting resources", in my humble opinion.
Oh, Lord Almighty. You are far, far off the edge. I will pray for you.
"Why should a company who doesn't advertise itself as politically neutral be obligated to cater to an audience simply because that audience exists?"
Oh, believe me, I do! My entire day has been ruined by the many responses telling me how much of a dumbass I am. My sole existence is reliant upon the need to conform to the popular opinion and the fact I commented an opinion that dissented from that was an idiotic move by me.
Conservative. It's not a term that is open to interpretation.
I can already tell how deep you are into the Democrat ideology and how they can do no wrong, as you aren't willing to concede the fact that some Democrat ideas are disproven bullshit.
….
"A dystopian nightmare" is your opinion, not one, regardless of how many times the AV Club regurgitates that viewpoint, that is shared amongst every single American.
My point was to comment and share my opinion, just as the 1000 other comments on this thread.
The liberal commentators far outweigh the conservative ones. Which is fine, that's the audience that frequents this site. I get it. That doesn't mean it wouldn't be a healthy thing for the AV Club to address the lack of conservative voices in their organization, especially as they have taken a keen interest in…
There are facts, statements, and ideas on both sides of the aisle that are disproven bullshit. What is your point exactly? Conservative disproven bullshit is more important than Democrat disproven bullshit?
Conservative.
I don't have a problem with it. I said it might be a good idea. Just a suggestion. How dare I!