Goes directly to abortions - if I'm correct, which admittedly I may not be and I appreciate you providing further information, it does not tackle federal spending going to companies who provide abortions.

My point was it is far too early to assume environmental regulations will be demolished as a whole. As it stands, the stories regarding Trump putting a "silence" order over the EPA was deemed false. But if you wish to deal in speculation and assumptions, go right ahead.

That article assumes federal spending is purely for welfare, which is not the case. Nicely misleading. Fits well with the narrative.

You asserted that no funding of Planned Parenthood goes to abortions. I'd love to believe that - which is why I asked for a source.

That's a horrible way to look at it. The free press is supposed to keep your elected officials in check. If the free press cannot be trusted, the erosion of trust in government occurs. Simple.

The implementation of the executive order was not ideal, I admit. Grand scheme of things only ~120 people were effected that Saturday out of 325,000. In regards to terrorism, there have been people from those countries who have been arrested over the past 10 years for planning acts of terrorism. None actually…

Source?

94% of Muslims are not banned. You can spin that however you like, but ultimately, blame Obama. Blame Congress. They compiled the list.

Source?

By all means, don't believe me - believe someone who used to work there.

— has yet to occur; EPA head just got confirmed today
— false story; do your research
— no evidence of illegal wrongdoing found
— 94% of Muslims not banned; false narrative; do your research
— fair
— has yet to occur; no way to know what will happen with replacement bill
— look no further than news media
— overwhelming…

WUT? Liberals encouraged to not play games with his survey? That's unfortunate.

Loved every second of it! Classic Trump!

Although it occurred to me while watching that the monologue was exceptionally long, I ate up every second of it. My stomach was in a knot by the time the story turned on Eddie. Something about Cranston; he sells the sinister mob-type guy very well.

"… That's been proven a total failure". I would point you to the many small businesses, my family's escrow company being one, that are excited for less taxes and regulations. I know, as far as our company is concerned, that we are struggling to stay afloat amidst the countless unnecessary and reckless taxes and…

Actually you did bring up 62 million in your effort to show him as a "third place finisher", but OK.

It's nice that you cherry-picked one of the few policies that is light(er) on the specific details. Goes well with your narrative. Can I point you to the "Veterans Affairs Reform", "Trade", "Tax Plan", "Immigration", or really any other policy page?

Weird - I wonder how he won the Presidency? Couldn't have been because of a thing we call the 'electoral college'….

Noted. Have a great rest of your day!

I would encourage you to look further into his policy proposals. The fact you say "… he has none" tells me you haven't looked far beyond CNN/MSNBC/AVClub for your news sources. Here are a couple websites to get you started, if you actually want to learn (which there is a strong chance you don't):