hawkstwelve
hawkstwelve
hawkstwelve

I understand that executive actions are necessary in certain situations, that's the reason they were enacted. My point was they shouldn't be used in the sole purpose of navigating around Congress. I would imagine they were supposed to be used more when the President needs to pass something that requires a speedy

Alright. Here's a few:

Give me a half hour to get home and I will gladly go over some of his policies that I agree with.

I never said GWB never placed executive actions. I believe I was implying executive actions in general are wrong, hence the whole checks and balances part of my comment. Republican or Democrat, that's not how our government should operate. I think we could both agree on that. Also, needing to be reigned in when you

Refusing to call someone deplorable hardly constitutes as accepting said persons place in your party. You forgot to source that on that same interview, he stated he did not accept Duke's support of him and DJT. But that was a nice try.

The reasons those examples were brought up was in the context of me replying to other people. If you really care about what I think about his policies, I would be more then happy to discuss those with you. Something tells me you really don't care.

Cannot say the same for you and your examples of why HRC will be a great President. At least I am trying to give insight to my opinion, in an evidently hostile forum. Give credit where credit is due.

I have provided evidence/examples of why I think Trump will do better. Please see my many other comments to many other people if you want to see examples, as if that will better your opinion of my opinion. At least I can admit the wrongdoings of my candidate. Cannot say the same for many Democrats, unfortunately.

Did I say him mocking was OK? I said, "for better or worse", which means that it isn't necessarily a good thing to do. I support him because I believe he will do better for this country in 4 years than Hillary Clinton has done in 30 years. Pretty simple.

That is the least of what Hillary Clinton has done. Please give three examples of where she has bettered women, minorities, and/or children's lives. Hell, give two. You probably won't, just like you didn't supply the source of Trump/Republicans openly accepting the KKK into the party.

That's what I figured. Confronted, proven wrong, now going away. Why can you guys not debate without pulling out as soon as someone challenges what you are saying? Whatever.

Still waiting for the source… I thought I was making stuff up? Please, prove me wrong so I can admit you are right, oh holy one.

I have condemned and admitted Trumps wrong-doings multiple times throughout these comments, to multiple different people. I am trying to prove that the standard you hold Trump to of not taking advice from a "scumbag of a human being" should also be applied to HRC. You can inherit money, many people do, and many people

Bill Clinton is an absolute scumbag of a human being, who has repeatedly cheated on his wife and (supposedly) raped a woman, but HRC takes advice from him anyways. Hell, she has him speak on behalf of her because he is brilliant, usually, at what he does. If you were studying for a test and there was someone who had

Roger Ailes, for better or worse of the accusations against him, is a brilliant mind in politics. Even beloved Democrats have admitted that. This is not taking into account Trump campaign's repeated denial of Ailes advising Trump. But thanks for picking out one section of an otherwise large comment to try and prove

Please give me the source of where Trump has suggested the use of nuclear weapons outside of that unsourced comment, and I will stand corrected. His comments on Japan and South Korea having nuclear weapons was in the context of talking about how to deal with North Korea. If calling for the arming of your allies to

Surprisingly enough, I can kind of see where you are coming from here and recognize that 90% of what you just said is coming from your own opinion. Of course, my main argument is not whether Donald Trump says questionably-unmoral things. My main argument is the double standard of a large part of both the media and the

You cannot imagine what this comment is targeted at? Have you not seen the countless other articles, posts, tweets, etc. shaming Fallon for not grinding questions on Trump? I have to give it to the AV Club - this article was much more hidden about it then they normally produce and at least showed a sem-balance of

Please show me where DJT, Pence, or any other Republican has explicitly stated "I thank David Duke for his support and I welcome all other KKK members into our party". If you do, I will absolutely stand corrected.

The KKK is deplorable, among many other horrible things. One of the most despicable groups there are. I, nor DJT, or any other Republican really, has ever said anything different. Trump, along with Pence, has repeatedly said they do not want the support of Duke or any of his followers. Blaming Republicans for the KKK