hawkstwelve
hawkstwelve
hawkstwelve

Ok now, I can admit Trump has said some controversial things but some of the above claims are simply inaccurate. The "nuclear weapons" comment was something that the media concocted when hearing, from an 'anonymous source' mind you, of something Trump (supposedly) said behind closed doors, to which everyone in the

If you are stating that she has many, many faults then you and I agree. One of those (many) faults is the utter-corruption that she has brought into Washington DC (not that it isn't corrupt already). That type of leading, in my opinion, is not welcome in America. It belongs in third-world governments where cash and

Insightful, please continue.

The idea of Russian Roulette as this election is an interesting comparison that I could actually kind of agree with, seeing as neither candidate is exceptional. If you want more of the same, then by all means, go for Hillary. I want change; I want a unified America; I want safety; I want prosperity; I want many

Encouraging healthy discussion of differing view-points is not "panties in a bunch". That's the problem in today's world (one of the many) - you cannot simply discuss different viewpoints without being called any sort of name in the book. I haven't called anyone deplorable, or "fucking delusional" as said above. Just

I'll be the first to admit that Trump is an egomaniac. That being said, I believe that type of personality would actually be beneficial in the white house. If you think outside the little box that Hillary tries to make you think in, an egotistical person would never want to fail on the promises that they produced.

I believe the amount of bad things Trump would do would pail in comparison to Hillary Clinton, as evidence by her 30+ years in politics already. We've given her the power and we have seen what she does with it. Why not try the same with Trump? Why not give him a shot to prove himself? I could ALMOST guarantee it will

Not near the amount as HRC, and somewhere in there, you know that. As a business-minded person, who ran a multi-billion dollar company, (I would assume) you are bound to do things that upset people. I am not going to say for a second that I could understand the stuff that needs to be done to keep a large, behemoth

Fair enough. I'm not saying Trump is a saint… actually far, far from it and I'll be the first to admit he has said many things that could be considered 'deplorable'. But when it boils down to it, it's a binary choice: HRC or DJT. I would much rather have someone who says bad things, instead of does bad things.

"Free" never fails.

I'm fine being called deplorable; unlike many on the left I can withstand criticism and not get my panties in a bunch. I would much rather be called deplorable then vote for a lying, epitome-of-corrupt, run-of-the-mill politician that only cares about herself, no matter how much she's convinced you otherwise.

She's definitely starting to get her fair share of criticism from the media, I won't deny. It just took her calling 60 million Americans "deplorable" and her almost collapsing in order to get it to happen.

A lifelong "civil servant" or a lifelong servant to herself? I guess in today's Washington it's one in the same and that goes for both sides of the aisle.

Yes I read the article, along with the many other articles on many other "news" sites, in addition to FB and Twitter. Don't play naive, you know what I am talking about whether you want to admit it or not.

I'll be interested to see if the left/media outlets/AV Club gets so upset/angry/disappointed in Jimmy Fallon when he fails to ask Hillary Clinton any "hard questions" on Monday's show, of which he could ask many (same as Donald).

Trump/Pence 2016! MAGA!

Finally! Thanks for the heads up.

Hallelujah!

I got all excited when I read "previous three seasons will all be hitting Netflix on August 1" but when I go to Netflix, what do you know, no third season. Lame.

Happy Valley! Amen.