If I had a penny for every book or script I saw that I knew, without question, that I could do better than, I'd almost certainly be sufficiently wealthy as to pursue it as a full-time career.

So what should the teacher do about that? Call social services?

Nope, not just you. A baffling phenomenon, going by the experiences everyone else seems to have, but not one I'm going to complain about.

Each of 'em was rated by hotness (by a team of totally objective scientists, not a teen clique, for your information).

Too late, it's gone, I already sold it to the finance industry!

Too. Much. Racism. Can't. Choose. Target.

I'm certain there's an actor he bears a strong facial resemblance to, but the name escapes me at the moment.

Few things pain me more than judging my own writing to be eternally unreadable and then seeing something published that's even worse.

It's like the one thing the villains are supposed to be able to do right: they're supposed to always have a better fashion sense. The North Koreans don't even have that going for them.

I'm not seeing it. Even for an insane dictatorial regime, their uniforms just aren't that exciting.

Agree entirely. Whether or not I think I match someone well, I truly do appreciate a comprehensive, detailed, and honest profile, because it gives you more than enough information to decide whether or not there's sufficient cause to express interest. I made sure I was quite clear about who I am and what I expect, put…

Yeah, I think it's the sort of thing that's more useful for some people than others. If you're young, in good health, relatively free of responsibilities, live in a major urban center, and spend a lot of time at parties/bars/clubs/socially acceptable places to meet and approach new people, yeah, you're probably not…

I'm sure your experiences are entirely true, but I think that's a behavior that most men indulge in regardless of format: the internet merely makes it easier for them to do so. From what I've seen and heard, though, it's the sort of thing where the results tend to be similar to the amount of effort you put in. Casual…

Anyone who answers a lot of questions generally has numerous opportunities to set off warning flags (apart from the obvious clashes in values, elements of their profile that contradict each other). If someone only answers a handful of easy questions with low potential for conflict, that's a warning flag of its own.…

I wouldn't claim it's supremely effective or awesome, but I wouldn't say the same for regular dating methods, either. It's a way to meet people, like any other. For some people, it doesn't work out. For others, it does. If you've got all the ways to meet people in your life you want, great. If you're short on time and…

The thing, I think, is that you can have bad experiences with online dating without writing off the entire process for everyone. The same way you can have bad experiences in a comments section or a message board without writing off the whole platform for communication. Yeah, there are more creepy and obnoxious people,…

Yeah, I went with the same approach. It took a bit of trial and error to get it down, but it's reliably turning out results I find favorable now. Answer a bunch of questions, see who you match with, and answer more/reweight existing answers as needed if you find it's misinterpreting your intentions (it took me quite a…

To my knowledge, just about everyone is flooded with those. The trick seems to be picking out the rare worthwhile ones and figuring out how set the filters in your own favor so you can search out someone you think is worth giving a chance.

It's the modern-day equivalent of people who thought the telephone would never catch on because it supposedly lacked the vital element of personal interaction. Then they moved on to computers. Now online dating.

Yeah, part of using it as a successful tool, I think, is figuring out how to adjust it not necessarily to attract as many people as possible, but to attract the kind of people you want to attract.