Too bad this is the internet or I’d make a bet with you. That girl is a fighter and very much loves to prove it. I bet she’s back soon. Sadly, she’ll have to do a fight or two before a rematch and by then the odds are she may not even have an opponent to fight. Holm may very well retire before Rousey is given a shot…

Yes, and it will never work? Just because she was able to clear an arm bar this time doesn’t mean that Rousey can’t go back to her basics, not attempt to box with a better boxer, and find ways to win. Your conviction based on one win, it as misplaced as Rousey’s overconfidence.

Or she can just focus on grappling. Unless you’re saying that without the ability to box one cannot win an MMA fight?

Yeah, I had typo . . . ohhhhhhhh no!

Reporting requires giving information, but pointing to it. Breaking news, world economics is shifting . . . see article here. He not reporting.

I saw the charts in the other article with a great key. I suppose that what I am asking may not be possible here because that would mean this author would have to create content instead of just stealing pieces of others’ work. Or maybe she could just post the link to the other article with nothing more. At least then…

I see charts that don’t make sense. When you provide a visual aide, it’s best if the data key is provided. Otherwise I just see different stages of pac man. I hope future authors understand this.

How many times do you want to ask the same dumb question?

Yeah. Why the fuck not? I can think of a hundred scenarios where someone might end up uninterested at a political rally and why not use that time to learn something?

I love the “She called you daddy for 18 years, now it’s our turn.” To what? Call her daddy? Call her dad, daddy? If you’re going to be funny on a bedsheets banner, bring your A game. This is clearly a future 6 year senior.

It does in some jurisdictions. https://www.justia.com/criminal/docs/…

I think you’re a dick and the DA is a pussy. I would try that ass clown for attempted manslaughter.

I think you sir have a claim for intentional inflection of emotional distress. It just aint right.

That’s the set backs he was talking about. Because every car that was sold had official specs. If the software lowers MPG, horse power, etc, then the car is not up to specs as sold. So every owner has a right to return the car for a fix or a refund. So not going to be an quick fix.

I’d take her down to the dealership and make them buy her back, full price for false advertising. If they won’t do it, then go hire a lawyer. This check will write itself.

Totally different. Your example this is no intent. Here there is clear intent. That’s what make this one more jail worthy. The ignition thing was bad business decision, but they intent wasn’t to kill people.

I totally agree. There was some exec who signed off on this project. That guy purposely defrauded the American Government. He needs to go to jail. If he’s in Germany, the US should cancel VW’s import rights until they produce the exec for jail time.

Nope. Most definitely two knuckles deep in the v-jay. Non medical expert, pretty well accomplished blaster.

This is a racist article, but I’ll let it slide on the account that it’s funny.

Such a shitty response. No one ever takes responsibility for fuck ups. Can’t you just say we over reacted we’re sorry. Fuck! The world makes mistakes. That’s excusable. Failing to acknowledge them is not.