I would never be in a serious relationship with a woman I wasn’t attracted to. Men are very visual, or at least I am. Monogamy is hard, no sense making it harder on yourself?

I’m going to go on record as saying. Yeah. I agree with him. Find the director that will make the film you want. If this piece isn’t a piece where diversity at the helm isn’t needed, then what we do it just to check off a box? So that we can say we’re promoting diversity?

Here this is the requirement for a negligence case:

cunt

Actually, the judge said that their is no precedence for establishing a wrongful birth case when the claimed defect is race. But he did not say that in a negligence case they would not mention race as cause of damage. And when the file their case again, which they will, unless the center is smart enough to settle…

Follow your statement to the next logical conclusion. “I payed for a service and that I didn’t get.” How were your damaged dear plaintiff? What was the result of the clinics’ negligence? Did if harm you. If it didn’t you have no damages and thus you have no claim. If you were harmed, please tell us how you were…

Do you really think the negligence suit will be any less upsetting to the little girl? What do you with the court will reward her if she goes in and say, “I love this little girl; She is the light of my life; I am so thankful to have her and can’t imagine my life without her; But they messed up and I’ll like some…

I think you’re looking at this from a very judgmental point of view. Perhaps more so than her. Raising a bi-racial child is not easy. There are still people that don’t accept it, not necessarily her. Could be her community. When one choses a partner of a different race, one accepts the tougher road that society will…

First, yes, data would still be admissible. Second, no, no one is paying for this. It’s a novel argument, but in one word no. If that were so, every paper that ever ran a story from a “leaker” would be trafficking stolen goods.

Nah. It just give lawyers a great list of documents and data to request during discovery. Good luck denying they have it. Plus, evidence obtained legally by the party presenting it is admissible even if the evidence was stolen so long as the presenting party did not take any part in the illegal activities used to…

Like I said yesterday, the real heroes will be those to sue for false advertising!

Well done. Well written. Well thought out. That’s all.

I’m waiting for the class action lawsuit to be filed. Not the ones that are expected for the lack of security. Not the ones for failing to wipe the info. But rather, the one that say’s it was a scam and I want my money back! Those will be the true heroes of this story.

When there’s a choice, always go with Mel Gilbson’s cunt mouth.

Damn you. Get off my claim!

Give them to me!

But pointing it out doesn’t mean trying to create mystery around it. We all know why he won’t condemn Ecuador. If he didn’t he’d find himself on an express flight back to the US. So why pretend there is mystery? Why not just say, “Isn’t it two faced that JA claims to be mercenary for transparency but willing to bite…

“Spending” time on Gawker, that’s truly funny. What because you wrote it a year ago, I’m supposed to leave it be? Is that the grandfather clause for shitty posts on the internet. If you see an old post with little to no merit, you must leave it be . . . it belongs to time itself now and you must not question time…

Dude go eat a bag a dicks! I hate click bait and love seeing a preview so that I know if i’m going to waste my time on something, its the kind of thing I want to waste my time on. Shut it, fuck off, and quite ruining the internet. As if it needs any help.

Did the high life supplant PBR overnight and I missed it on the “what’s hip now” memo?