I think the thing I find this most analogous to is “AutoTune”.

And to those people, I say: “Come on, really? Come on.”

lol. was this gibberish supposed to mean something? Bye, grey!

tell me you don’t understand scale without telling me you don’t understand scale.

Ne’s also wrong (at least outdated) about how good AI code “completion” is. I followed another developer’s guide and wrote an entire app using nothing but ChatGPT. Working, deployed, sending and storing data, right now.

Did I say anything about the first person to post? That’s why you have a system - to screen for veracity. That takes human operators, and some third-party input. Like I said - they haven’t even done the FIRST step, which would be to have a system. But don’t think I’m saying that the first step is the only one they…

Jesus christ, this is the easiest thing in the world to not fuck up and it feels like every company is hell-bent on making the worst possible decisions in any given moment.

Oh sure; just a couple of non-lawyers shooting the breeze!

The packaging is evidence of intent, rather than an empirical breach of IP. The patent will do the heavy lifting of saying “this is what the patent is, in black and white”, but the arguments will have to persuade and my guess is that they are interested in the packaging because it shows that the IP was infringed both…

As said: I love Luke!

Not at all. I’ve curated my lack of friends quite confidently.

It’s not that I don’t comprehend, kiddo. It’s that I’ve been around this block, and argued with people like you before. I know how it turns out. I’m plugged in to the business community for this, as well as the tech community for this functionality. I do not fear it because the only thing that is concerning doesn’t…

oh, sorry, i see:

No?

So, while subjectively, it may make no difference to you, it is, and should be a concern for many in the art world who see this as a genuine threat to real creativity.

They don’t have to work together or do anything in order to not complain about the tech.

The idea that websites should be banning this for me is nothing different than lawyers deciding ChatGPT should be illegal, because people can draft legal documents without their help.

Well, I wouldn’t discredit the journalism; this is an opinion site, after all. And games journalism is enthusiast journalism; no different than fishing/hunting magazines, or car sites. As far as I’ve seen, he knows his stuff - at least academically. He’s giving his bad, and poorly supported opinion. But that’s IS what…

That’s the important bit that is so obvious: This is NOT a technology that we will be doing without. So we NEED to get ahead on legislating it, now. Otherwise, as you said, we’ll be legislating via courtroom litigation. That will ONLY serve to benefit corporations.

Reposting my reply to you, since Blind Prophet dismissed it.