Maybe because the C7 is about 3-400 pounds heavier?

Everyone knows dogs like pickups the best...

Did you design you house with any automotive themes? What is your garage(s) like?

Absolutely. I love them both but I'd probably opt for the 911s over the 4s. Unless turbo, of course. Just imagine what the Zo6 will do to a 4s? And still be cheaper, no doubt.

I don't really have a problem with it as long as it's not mandatory / regulated. I'd like it for my wife, always toting the kids around and all... But I'd opt out, save the dinero.

I guess roads and space depends on the country... but taxes would be prohibitively high on a 6.7 liter diesel pickup for personal use. Am I wrong?

I really don't understand the euro need to disparage. It's totally different circumstances. From roads, to fuel costs, to taxes, to outright space... I can see why Euro's want to make do with the smallest vehicle they can. Here, we don't have to and the bigger, more powerful trucks make life easier. Especially for…

Guess what? The trailer holds the car AND the tools! Imagine that! And when unhooked you don't have to drive around a stupid looking box van, it can be used for daily transportation needs!

Takeaway: Holy shit! The C7 is faster than a 911 4s around a track!

Again. Golf clap.

Oh wow. Have fun with that. At least you can look at gigantic trucks as well as a lot of other new cars.

Well, you said, "Seriously, this is getting a bit ridiculous. Who needs this?". My point is, again, even if it is never used for it's intended purpose, so are many cars. The 25 year old chick in Camaro or 370z probably does not explore the potential of her vehicle. So what? Should she therefore not own one? You will…

Even if that were true, which I don't believe it is, my point is that why do you care what is needed versus what people want and are actually buying a shit-ton of? I really give no shits about what you buy if you perceive that it is good.

Actually, you are confused about what constitutes a fact. Hearing something countless times on the internet does not, in fact, constitute a fact.

d'oh. I missed it.

It's over the top by what standard? Your standard of need? Or someone actually doing the works standard of desire. That is my point. Is 140 hp necessary? 200? 1000hp Veryron? It's what people want and that really should be reason enough.

I'd double recommend this if I could. I lol'd.

No. I really didn't.

True. They are different. One exists and is going on right now in Dallas. The other, to my knowledge, does not exist.

Going back and killing dinosaurs would reduce future herd sizes and ultimately result in fewer carbons. Unless you killed only predatory dinosaurs... then the population of the grazers would increase... until, of course, they ate all the food and starved. I dunno man, might be a bad idea.