gregoryjourdan
Ominous@RG
gregoryjourdan

EDIT: what is I want to remove my comment? Jee, gawker.

Ye wrote “so they’re secrets aren’t revealed to you”.

It’s hard to describe Tulip in the original comic, but I feel they undid her the way they undid Jesse. Made them a little meaner, little smaller, little angrier, little less chivalresque (knowing that I’m still talking about mostly lawless selfish people in the original material).

It’s free, look: engagement rings are vapid and a stupid waste of money.

Take a stand, brother!

Well there’s being upset and there’s just thinking it’s a bit lame.

All I know is I tried it solo with the bot and really got angry at a game more than I got at angry and any game before... So that’s my underrating right there.

Yeah, it is high time we ended that ruthless 100h war.

Well how about we just transfer our voting rights to some web form?

You misspelt “All Prime Day Deals”.

You misspelt “All Prime Day Deals”.

God I got in this article thinking you were showcasing the best deals, so I felt a SERIOUS wtf moment when the very first thing was the human centipede series.

“Literal jungle”. I was picturing a jungle made of books.

I’m going to guess the implication was that they would just disappear naturally, not banning or executing them or whatever drove your outrage.

Bro... Lee?

Love the hate Snapchat gets mostly based on its user base being young... I use snapchat to share random moments of my days with my family abroad and it’s amazing.

I think most are missing the point here. The question should NOT be “is chance ok in a card game”. The question should be “are those cards creating too much randomness”. It’s different. Chance is ok, good in card games. My gut feeling about the showcased card is yes, it’s too random.

A whatmeter now?

Yeah that’s fair. I’m not usually against language evolving, guess I just really don’t like this one :)

A word that LITERALLY at the same time means something and its opposite. Still sounds like a terrible idea to me.
I’m not sure about that Dickens reference, but one can still say using “literally” all the time sounds stupid.

Low hanging fruit, and I also completely disagree. His style is rather straight-forward and I don’t know if his usage of the language is particularly masterful but his narration, description, his way of conveying truly and simply humane emotions as well as setting up horror situations isn’t just something anybody can