gregoryjourdan
Ominous@RG
gregoryjourdan

In the US. That's what dating is, in the US. I know tons of Europeans who won't date you guys because of that. I could tell you I respect your ways, but I merely tolerate them. Yes, I do think when licking your fingers in a deal breaker you're a superficial person I don't want to associate with. Dating etiquette,

Please gizmodo girls, stop telling us about your dating experience. Everytime I hear insipid opinions about what's a deal breaker it hurts my respect for women.

Ah c'mon, you can barely say that of a genius artist. This guy can't be decent cause so much of his attention is focused on his masterful pieces of art? Well too bad then, I don't think he can pull it off; he's just making nice games.

I raise you one comment about people commenting about people commenting.

Well yes but I think you miss a very important point. Fish main issue is he acts like a pretentious asshole. I don't like him and that affects my opinion on his stuff a great lot. If I did I could easily defend him, his games are definitely not bad; I don't so it's easier to laugh at his arrogance now, and I suspect

Give me a big fat fecking break. Being offended is like a game now.

I think you almost have to work on the assumption that the games are going DESPITE being based on animes. Thing is, when a company wants to bank on an anime, they know they can do it with a so-so to bad game. And when another company wants to make a good game, they likely don't want to waste it on some (on average)

I find myself pretty much hoping this would be true. Corporate gaming isn't selling as well as it used to be, huh? And what do they do to try and save themselves? More copies of the same sell-outs, more in-your-face graphics, more violence, more tits, more hype, more dubstep. And one of the main concern (after the

Fascinating.

Love how you had to add "obese" to make it more striking.

Well yes, except nobody reads "iPhone costs you $1800 over a year" and think they're actually talking about only buying the phone.

Small panda, big panda, huge panda and humongous panda?

To be honest when given such a piece of news, one tend to find a reason to get upset. It being the way the thing was said, the timing, the wording, sometimes even much sillier things.

You're going to have to express your opinion in much much much much more extreme and peremptory fashion if you want people of the Internet to notice.

What's fun with biased journalism, is that you just can't be biased without saying silly stuff. My new favourite, a gadget blog writer saying "why is it big deal? Are you kidding me, gadget blog writers talk about it all the time!". Fun circular logic.

Ah cause you need to pose as a hula hooper. Didn't realize it was that cool.

Agreed to you entirely. Not saying everybody would, but people have to at least get out of their "real" gamer point of view. I'm pretty sure people who only know games through the phones (that is TONS of them), some of them would play them on a tv, yet would never consider a real game console and involved games.

That is going to change everybody's mind about tablet gaming huh. Way to lose your credibility over a phoney statement.

Because we can.

"Better" (I'm assuming in terms of bandwidth) isn't the absolute only criteria though; once wireless gets seemingly perfect, it'll be much "better" to select media somewhere, play it somewhere else, than having cables everywhere and wonder which one to plug in.