Discussed below.  They made it up until this year, and seem to have cancelled it for this product year.   Might return next year though

Yes, see below. 

It looks like they continued the line up until last year.  Some people seem to really like them. 

There seems to have been a cult following to ask for this to be reinstituted and I may have been misinformed. Take the above with some salt.

Didn’t Samsung do this years ago in their S series? They had an
“Active” line that was more ruggedized, and they discontinued the line because no one bought it, and the people who did just bought the regular phone and put a case on it that they could change. 

Brother, that second sentence is already wrong today. I just used a bluetooth converter to connect my Bose QC35's to the airplane entertainment audio within the last 2 weeks.  It uses a dongle, for sure, but I was using legacy equipment with wireless headphones. 

Criminal guilt or innocence would not and could not be stipulated in a civil settlement, as a civil settlement occurs between two persons, and criminal proceedings are between a person and the state.

Interesting. I’m in Grand Central every day, which has not only an Apple store, but also an unreal amount of AirPods being used at any given time. If the channels have to be a 1:1, is it really possible that there’s not 80 people using them within range of one another?  It’s totally possible, and I haven’t checked,…

This is an argument that’s salient to me, and I can’t really speak to the spectrum interference intelligently enough to say whether or not that’ll improve. I’m curious to hear more about that.

https://www.cnet.com/reviews/nokia-3310-review/

I’m not staunchly defending Apple or any other manufacturer removing the headphone jack, but if you had a time machine and fast forwarded 20 years, you sure as shit wouldn’t find a 3.5mm headphone jack on the current tech. 

There is no legal way for a civil settlement to absolve a client of guilt. There could be a clause to prevent criminal charges from being filed but the only way he could be acquitted (absolved of guilt, as you put it) is if this case went to trial in a criminal court and he was found not guilty. 

I love how you’re taking an article about a big cow this seriously. 

I want a twitch stream of your face as you thought of this, popped over to MS Paint, did the deed, and posted it.

Kentucky is a bubble-team. Happy with that.  Moving right along. 

I’m kind of glad.  I read an article on it and literally moved on and forgot about it within 10 minutes.  

Any excuse to post this. 

That’s possibly because his jowls have suffocated all of those who were brave enough to confront them.  I’m currently living in fear. 

Please tell me that you’re theorizing how this crash happened using only the photos above and Google Streetview.  PLEEASSEE.

It really does seem that the implication that his rookie salary is low, when he actually makes more than double the average annual salary.  I’d agree that saying league minimum is not the implication, but adding “on a rookie salary” suggests that that salary is lower than that of a veteran salary.