gothamsnetwork
DecoherenceEngine
gothamsnetwork

This is genuinely great and shows a profound understanding and respect for the source material, I really hope it explodes and proves to frigid producers we can make pulpy treasure hunt blockbusters movies in the 21st century that aren’t pure garbage (Looking at you, Indy 4 and Lara Croft)

Someday you silly Americans will use measurements that make the slightest amount of sense. Someday. I’ll keep rooting for you.

I’m not particularly fond of the assumption your making that the textbook, academic version of the French you’ve been taught is superior to the colloquial one. I know French is precious like that, what with having an “official authority” on the subject of linguistics, but this model is dying, and ought to.

Hey now. I for one might be French but I’m more than able to admit I’m wrong condescendingly

A Grammar Collabo is the term prefered by Word War II historians

Wait are you implying that while we may both have been brought up speaking French from most likely living in France on the account of being French, you studied French whereas I didn’t?

I mean it definitely sounds like what English speaking people think French is like but I *wouldn’t* blacklist a website for using that title.

Interesting fact, “X est très bien” is even on the edge of sounding condescending. That’s not the only use but depending on tone that’s what one would say to mean “X is fine/enough/satisfying”.

Hm, no?

I don’t know the fact that nothing can ever be truth anymore is a little scary still

How to be so coy and strict about the self-established sacredness of your spirituality that, in the collective consciousness of outsiders, it stays obtuse and foreign indefinitely.

OH MY FUCKING GOD A FUCKING BILLION OF THESE FUCKING PICTURES AND NOT FUCKING ONE TO FUCKING FOCUS ON THE FUCKING FRAME ON THE FUCKING SIDETABLE

So, not very diverse, is it.

Oh my, your life is made so difficult because of some people liking something, how relatable.

Well the thing is whether I’m right and he’s an idiot who can’t take thoughtful criticism because there are too many big words he doesn’t understand, or you’re right and he’s an imbecile who believes Kotaku is a political platform maintained by propagandists who want your poor innocent children to become the gays, my

Pal, *you* joined the conversation I was having with someone else, so you shut it. Go far and wide, I’m sure there are leagues of articles where you can possibly justify making it all about Ethics in Game Journalism in all of two comments before people realize you’re a lizard person come to sell hot girls in my area.

“What they know will be dishonest”. Man, you’re tearing me up. Please do elaborate on the Evil Conspiracy to Divert Games Reviews into the Realm of Tolerance Propaganda, that definitely sounds like something not fucking dumb

Look I have no fucking clue what train you’re on but this not my debate and not one I could ever feel stupid enough to consider worth my time. Since you’re so keen of ramming whatever nonsense idea you think you have whenever you see a hole, I’m not interested.

Well sure some analyses are terrible the same way everything can be terrible. That’s not what I reacted to. The comment I answered was some dude explicitly saying “I have now come to the point of the review where it speaks of its discourse issues, here’s me sighing.”

Okay, repeat after me: criticizing a work is not criticizing the people who like it. And to back that up, I’ll admit: I love trash. I love campy, terrible shit so much. I love that I can allow myself to watch Quiet’s butt in MGSV from literally *all *the angles and at the same time say “welp, not very progressive