Yep. Gilmore Girls, Simpsons, etc, all had stories that existed and worked outside of the pop culture references. It wasn’t their raison d’etre like it is RP1 or (later especially) Family Guy. Remove the references from the former and they still work. Remove them from the latter, and well, there’s nothing you can do,…

At least in the case of MST3K or early Simpsons, the references were never the focus of the gag - they were more of a seasoning that only the most eagle-eyed of observers (or people who watched DVD commentaries) picked up on. Things like slyly recreated shots or semi-quoted bits of dialog inserted for humorous…

So why even post it?

i like Moonraker. Underrated.

They leave “The Village” and find out the outside world uses Android?

Just what every woman wants: Uncle Fester in a Fred Durst hat.

She’s married to Scott Baio. I wouldn’t expect her to be a Rhodes scholar.

And everyone knows that Mr. Belvedere sat on his own balls.

“It looks like ALF’s nose.”

Seems like someone isn’t looking forward to being a sister-wife.

The real problem here is, once someone like Hannity (or Trump) has said it, no matter how often they or anyone else goes back on it, the lie will be repeated ad infinitum. Just ask someone on the right about this now: they’ll tell you Trump never tried to fire him and the NY Times lied. Or ask someone on the right…

Your uncle is 28-year-old powerlifter?

If this wasn’t all so terribly awful a hint of diversity would be mild positive for him.

My dad listens to sports radio sometimes since he’s way more into sports than I am, and he said he heard an interview with Don Mattingly where he said people on the street have never stopped telling him to trim his sideburns since the episode aired.

I still like him better than Steinbrenner.

And give Hulk Hogan his moustache back!

Being dismissed from the PGA is par for the course at this point.

yup, every club he’s a member of is now going to wait a couple days to announce kicking him out so they can all get their own social media pats on the back for it.

This is assuming that there is something inherently not progressive about open sexuality and smut, or that they are counter-intuitive to progressive movements, which isn’t true.