No, it's not. But these aren't the writing of a geneticist.

Because that's a reductionist, evo-psych nonsense premise. Eugenics hasn't been cool for like a century now.

Perception of beauty around fat is completely culturally bound. Let's fucking talk about it because it's dumb rationale. Just like not dating a man because they are short, bald, etc. Stupid superficial nonsense. So, instead of whining about whining I'd rather say—this is superficial shit that is holding all of us…

Correct. It seems they are responding to the FODMAPs rather than the gluten.

Welp, I did. From experience as well. We all get to talk from our experience.

That's what I used to think. But after a terrible relationship, good therapy, and some life I've realized that it's just complicated. I've had two lovers over the past year who were high status men (looks, wealth, etc) who would never date me because they feel a certain need to project a certain image. And I…

Yes and no. Just as women are defined by their looks — men often deal with having the looks of their partner as a definition of their own success.

Housekeeper/custodians at colleges usually cover a full building and they are the ones informing up about problematic graffiti. So, of course, as they clean all bathrooms.

Oh, now that's a mature justification. Another reminder that our bodies are just there for others to critique. Have a nice day.

Once upon a time in Jezebel land, long before there was kinja and back the comments were kind of intelligent, there was a no body snark policy and that included gossip about potential EDs.

Hey, gluten sensitivity is not Celiac's. They're not claiming Celiac's isn't real. There is some evidence that gluten sensitivity might not really be the gluten. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2364869…

Right. I mean it's almost like this is a for profit site with multiple contributing writers posting constantly throughout the day/

Shelf stable products can be in a box and still all natural. That's a really broad brush you are painting with.

Of course not. Just like we can't paint institutions of higher education with the same monolithic brush.

A - fricking - men.

I'm sorry/You're welcome?!

Less TMI than our staff meeting discussion about beets and poop this morning. Have a good one!

Honestly, it's been a long day and I missed the PhD. Shit happens.

A yes, a Bachelor's in law. Something not exactly recognized in US practice and not even for admission to bar/pratice. You're correct about in loco parentis in the UK.

Here we don't either. They may sit on judicial boards, but don't make the final decision. Additionally, it's no longer considered appropriate practice for sexual assault cases to do that per federal law.