glutenfree
GlutenFree
glutenfree

Sorry, that looks planned as fuck. The way Cutler keeps glancing over at his PR guy, and then asks "We're going to wait for them?"

Of course it's the media making it more sensational for publicity, because New York magazine would have NOTHING else to publish that people want to read if not for their made-up stories about some idiot.

Point still stands that they apparently put more effort into protecting their logo than they do in, you know, not using slave labor.

Uhhhh... no.

I heard that the Virginia state legislature just came back in session just to change the speeding rules so that you'll bring your vacation dollars back!!! It's on CNN right now!

God, it was the game of the sissy quarterbacks, something like this was bound to happen.

I'm genuinely shocked Kobe Bryant allows his teammates on the same plane.

Police do protect us, and they do protect the Brown's stadium. They don't do it as a personal favor though. They do it because it's their job. They work for us. And we're allowed to talk shit about them, the same way we're allowed to talk shit about any of our public servants.

No kidding... I rememer them being a big deal when I was kid. Alexi Lalas and all that. The hell ever happened to HIM?

Are people unaware there's a race problem, or is it that they don't give a fuck?

I'll be damned — I had no idea they were playing for this? Who did they beat?

The article treats the news of the grievance as a new story, which... it is.

What sort of mitigating factors do you think could still be out there? I mean, if we accept (even partially) that the team and Belachik were actively trying to fuck someone out of money they owed him... what would you think might still come out to make it all better?

Nope, nope and nope.

I dunno, I liked it.

Was it banned because it's an awful song?

Officially says who?

And I'm going to argue with you and say it's 18 miles long, because I'm that guy and that's what you do in NH.

That was an over-simplification. Media showing crimes is not illegal, but the main rationale for banning child pornography is not that it's obscene (as the OP claimed), it's because the government has an interest in protecting the children who are shown being victimized. The government is saying, "We're banning this