Sodastream.

Unfortunately, you seem to have included me in that category. This case isn't about lack of evidence, it's about the story that was publicized was apparently demonstratively false. That doesn't mean something bad didn't happen, but this isn't a case of the victim not being believed. She was believed. That's the point.…

That's your interpretation of the evidence, not a factual statement.

Overwritten.

Or, let them watch the news. The thing that we use to explain occurrences in the world.

No wolverine? C'MON, you SERIOUS?!??!!??

Homey from Islip wants to know why he would let his kids "Watch riots"... well, so they can watch the St. Louis Rams game without having Daddy fucking meltdown and call Mike Francesca for advice on how to explain it. That's what news programs are for. To explain what's happening in the world.

I was uncomfortable with Tebow talking about God, but I didn't think he should apologize for it. It's okay to not like something. It's stupid to call Mike Francesca and bitch about how it shouldn't be allowed.

It's amazing you churned out that many words for such a short worthless exchange.

So, that's not really the case here. It's not like she failed to document it. It appears what she described to Rolling Stone did not happen.

So, when it comes to the government restricting speech in advance of publication, there is actually a very long and closely examined (and very logical) line of thought: do not do, at all, unless absolutely necessary.

Why do I mention immigrant women? Uh. Did you read the post?

Is the porn a symptom or a cause of the fucked up behavior? Are they watching the porn because they've got fucked up thoughts in their head, or are they getting the fucked up thoughts from the porn? If any part of your answer is that the porn is a symptom, then banning the porn won't work — if men have desires to…

People going to jail for watching the Simpsons? That's your argument for a sensible law?

I don't make the court rulings, I just look them up on Wikipedia.

Incorrect.

Child porn is not illegal because it's morally corrupting. It's illegal because it portrays a crime. Banning media simply because we find it distasteful or immoral is a really bad idea. There are a lot of things in your life that Ted Cruz finds distasteful and immoral and he could be our next president — do you really…

Really? I just can't believe that.

Really? I just can't believe that.

How is it a cheap shot or irrelevant?

Says the person obsessively posting about him at 4am.