to be clear, this is only in regards to Call of Duty. Not everything. Anyone who read this and assumes it’s about anything else needs to go back to grade school. 

I mean, it’s more likely that MS makes more money by selling copies of CoD to Playstation owners than they would make by selling additional Xboxes to people if they made CoD exclusive. See also “Microsoft owns Minecraft, and sells it everywhere.” By the time that this changes, I doubt CoD would be that popular…

They just admitted that Starfield would probably sell 10 million copies on PlayStstion, and yet they’re keeping that one exclusive...

The rear suspension pieces of the AWD 200 has “Alfa Romeo” stamped upon them. The argument here to separate one vs the other (Chrysler vs Alfa, good vs bad)) is muddied by this fact.

Your sacrifice will serve so many others.

They do have a couple of other series that may or may not be of interest to people here- notably Halo and Ghosts (YMMV on both). And the Dungeons and Dragons film is streaming exclusively on Paramount+.

Yeah, I’m calling a bit of BS on that claim of this being a Boomer/Gen-X problem. The people making death threats online to developers over stupid video game things aren’t 70, they’re more likely 15-30.

That’s the interesting part of doesn’t being a fan of the source material matters because it raises the question what happens if they’re fandom is different?

The people getting mad at the show are the ones who are whining it isn’t like the game. I have some complaints about the shows but I would give it a solid 6 or 7. There are some things the show did really well. Like Yen’s backstory.

The jumping timeline was done terribly. Arguably the worst thing about the first season by far.

I’m a fan of the books and I don’t see anything about the adaptation that doesn’t fall into the standard “this is the sort of thing you do when you adapt something” bin. Like they could not possibly keep the “why exactly is Nilfgaard invading” mystery a secret for as long as they did in the books.  I think a lot of…

I’m sure they anticipated that, but it’s Netflix show. I doubt they believed they’d get beyond 2 series.

He thought for the witcher series and to be in it. So it is rather strange that he’d give up on it, even more so since he doesn’t seem to be a greedy person.

Less than a year ago the actor said he told the Hollywood Reporter he was “absolutely” committed to the show’s seven-season plan

Cabin in the Woods! [pulls up Wikipedia] Crap, that was Chris.
How about Bad Times at the El Royale? [tabs back over] Damn, also Chris.

I’m not all-in on this explanation, but it could certainly be part of the issue combined with Cavill getting more popular (and therefore probably harder to pay for and schedule around for an intensive series like this). Plus I can imagine even if he deeply loves the material and the character, being locked down to a…

It’s just mind-blowing this is where Netflix decides to cheap out. They blow hundreds of millions if not billions on shovelware crap. Then on one of their actual hits, they won’t pony up and work around the Superman filming needs.

Chris Hemsworth, probably.

Liam Hemsworth? Liam? More expensive than Cavill? That’s unlikely.

In terms of Hemsworth salaries, he’s probably 4th.

1. Chris
2. Chris’ daughter
3. Chris’ wife
4. Liam, the “other” Hemsworth
5. The other, other Hemsworth

Stans are the worst.