(hence my surprise at the qualifier)  

Wait, possibly psychosomatic?    

Of course Stalin wasn’t “liberal,” and no reasonable person would argue otherwise.

Jesus, 70 is like 137 in pro wrestler years.  

Actually I was asking the other person.  But thanks, I guess?  

Which do you think is more historically ignorant? Conflating Hitler with “conservatives,” or with “liberals?” (trick question, both are stupid, ahistorical comparisons made by people who never took a history class that wasn’t followed immediately by gym)

Don’t forget that he’s also been inside Ann Coulter and Laura Ingraham.  

The problem arises by trying to apply modern bespoke definitions of “left” and “right” to political systems from the first half of the 20th century that have accepted political labels.

The Bolsheviks abolished Tsarist laws against homosexuality in 1917, and Stalin re-criminalized male sodomy in 1933 (some sources say ‘34).

I’m not sure my point was well made. It wasn’t the homophobia at all. Persecution of gay people has nothing to do with whether a political system was“right” or “left.”

To prove that Hitler wasn’t a “right-winger” but truly belongs to the left, D’Souza notes that the dictator is often deemed right-wing because he’s perceived as homophobic. (Well, yes.)

Somewhere, Bas Rutten is smiling.

That’s a bold pro-sexual assault stance to take in ranking Le Pew so highly.  Let’s see how it plays out.  

I want to see how the GOP stalwarts are going to defend this one.

I think the Christmas special strongly implies that they both had the courage to move on with their lives.

He can jam with Michael Bolton.

That pug has probably been dead for decades, though.  

I really couldn’t disagree more.  Look at the way Dawn reacts to Tim telling her about his long-term prospects at the paper company. She’s horrified, because he’s giving up. There’s no similar horror at Jim and Pam settling for something they hate.

Sploosh.  

Now here’s the twist, and there is a twist: we show it. We show all of it.