That’s it?

When the level of thought you’ve put into it is “it will be negotiated”, it’s hard to be too specific, you know?

Good lord, they’re absolutely not ideological lines. They are historical boundaries of nation-states and nationalities. The USSR didn’t do anything even close to resembling what you’re proposing. It split up in the pre-existing boundaries that existed long before the USSR came along, it didn’t shuffle its population…

You misunderstand. I’m not complaining, I’m pointing out that you have arguing a terribly thought-out position that is silly at its core.

Lol, you think “rough north-south divide” is an answer. That about sums up the level of thought you’ve put into this topic you are so passionate about.

The only real additional question on the table is territory.

The fact that you can’t answer a direct question like that demonstrates that even you recognize this isn’t something even remotely plausible.

You think that breaking up the United States would be comparable to...Brexit? Oy vey.

Civil war. Not “economic chaos.” Civil war.

No one said we aren’t politically divided in many areas. Dissolution of the country would result in civil war, whether you choose to acknowledge it or not.

The political naivete it takes to think that this country could be broken up without extreme bloodshed and economic chaos, if not ruin, is remarkable.

Seriously, it’s just as stupid coming from you. http://thefederalist.com/2018/04/10/time-united-states-divorce-things-get-dangerous/

Nah, that other group was wearing cargo shorts and Under Armor shirts with wrap-around sunglasses. This one is wearing cargo shorts and cotton t-shirts with wrap-around sunglasses. Totally different aesthetic.

This is what happens when one parent has a couple beers and starts talking loudly about Keynes’ theories of market recovery and another can’t help but shout back that Hayek was right about excessive credit creation. Seen it a million times.

Jesus, that’s silly, and no less silly when it’s coming from a liberal premise than an alt-right doofus waxing about how the country needs to be broken up for everyone’s benefit.

Yeah, civil war and displacing tens of millions of people is the way to go. Good thinking.

Dear SPITO,

I’m not at all sure of your point. The fact is that players do, in reality, regularly get knocked senseless in NFL games. Does it really matter to the guy’s brain whether the player could have used a different method to tackle him?

And what “immoral and unethical means” are you referring to, specifically?

I’m not sure you read what I wrote.