Fuck that, I say. Sanders is many things, but he is not perfect, or close to perfect, or even anything other than a politician. In fact, Sanders and his plan to save blacks through redistributing wealth to narrow the wealth gap are deeply flawed, because the principle which serves as the scaffolding for his plan is…

What am I supposed to be looking at here?

I have never appreciated purposeful density as much as I did today. Bravo.

If only there was some clear footage of what happened, perhaps some footage that Gawker media had already talked about today.

Why would it?

By shady do you mean expecting to not be believed no matter what they say and no matter how many experts agree that their assessment is correct? Cause that’s the pattern I’ve seen of late.

No, they should be trained to shoot to eliminate the threat and they are. What you’re asking for is for cops to say “hey, i’m probably going to die in a gunfight” because you think life is a fucking movie.

And what kind of harebrained scheme involves crashing your own car into a showroom to steal another one?

This kind of thing is literally the best thing about the internet. It’s why I’ve watched hours of DayZ playthroughs just to see the good guys beat the bad guys and then become friends with them (sometimes), a thing that hardly ever happens in real life but absolutely could.

Is it irrelevant? The question asked was within the context of what constitutes “big game” for the purpose of getting awards from an association, not how physically large the animal you’re hunting is. He answered with a very specific response that seemed to be pointing to a kind of “specific rules for consideration.”

So you were corrupting a system that would have been workable and ethical and feeding the desire of non-hunters with guns and small dicks to finally kill something.

I’m sure you’re a vegan.

Right? Maybe read about where the Sierra Club came from while you’re trying to figure out what the word means. That’s a good start. Gawker comments is not.

LOL, okay man. Maybe argue the topic next time instead of trying to “out” people for the way they write an internet comment, y’know, like when you defended your thesis.

I’ve written an academic defense before. However, I refrain from using a mention of that fact in my posts on the internet for obvious reasons.

There’s more to it than the cynical “let’s show em” view as well. As you’ll note, my comment takes both of the things we’re discussing into account without eliminating either.

My understanding is that we didn’t but that more were in the process of being built. They were hand made at the time.

Eh, it was literally dropped because the Japanese refused to surrender after the first bomb. Showing the Soviets was more of a bonus. The US military wanted to drop another one just prior to the Japanese surrender but Truman said no.

#savethetrophywives!

Yeah, they were calling her huge as a compliment. No surprise that Jez doesn’t understand that given this site’s implied adherence to traditional beauty standards in order to sell the idea that it’s rebellious. Here’s what they actually said.