Jorni’s a fucking troll with half-a-dozen other burner accounts who runs around saying almost the right thing and talking to himself. The “minority” thing was intentional.

I find stories like this heartbreaking.

And if you go back to pre-partition Palestine, Jerusalem was the capitol - so their claim to it is pretty solid. We are in the here and now, though, and the latest history takes precedence - it was unified by force. Sharing Jerusalem as a capital for both states, I think, would be a fantastic outcome. It would show so…

Irrelevant. Half of that city is also what would be the capitol of a Palestinian state. The half conquered in ‘67 by Israel, mind you. Also, the rest of the world does not recognize this, because of the divisive nature of it. Insisting on this as Trump is doing is expressly going to make the 2-state solution significan…

Just because Israel claims it doesn’t mean the rest of the world recognizes it. Let’s not be coy, Israel is actively trying to change the demographics of Jerusalem in order to strengthen its claims and then claim a fait accompli.

No you don’t. You’re using their talking points and narratives as usual. Your language betrays your affiliation with the alt-right. You’re trying to gaslight people, as usual.

You’re an anti-Muslim piece of shit that regularly posts hate speech on this site. No one is going to believe your weaponized dishonesty.

Of course productivity is up. Without pesky details like morality and legality in the way, their job suddenly got much easier.

Why the hell is this far-right neo-Nazi sympathizing piece of shit still not banned? He does nothing but troll.

This is so stupid. Mostly because there is no upside at all. None.

The prosecution’s “depraved game of third-person russian roulette” theory was such an obvious, stupid overreach. This was probably a close case for involuntary manslaughter and I’m sure that’s what the jury spent six days deliberating over. It was never, ever, ever a provable murder case and its politicization was and…

None of those groups do this (from your linked article):

She’d likely see herself as a conservative martyred hero or some such. The long game is to portray the Post as credulous and possibly printing fake stories, thus casting into doubt all of the other women’s testimonies.

I’m all too familiar with Red here—she’s a devout Assadist, and the only Arabs she approves of are Arab tyrants who keep their people in chains.

Like that friend who wants you and the person who treats you like shit for no reason to get along by having you do more emotional labor and letting them walk all over you.

For some reason, the NYT, and NPR have adopted the policy that they need to fight the “liberal bias.” They never will, their platonic ideal of journalism that never existed to begin with is not achievable. they will never convince republicans that they are neutral. these people still believe in supply side economics…

South Park did an episode on that recently. They were making fun of how people go on ancestry websites, find a minority 5 generations back, and then claim that they can’t be racist. “I’m 12% victim!”

Hey, no problem. In fact, I know the difference between ‘your’ and ‘you’re,’ too!

You couldn’t, aside from the messed-up citations, I saw pages with completely un-labelled graphs - I’m talking no legend, no axis labelling, NOTHING.