g4va
g4va
g4va

Yeah. . . .agree with you. . . Particularly about Evan Spiegel. Most people are inconsiderate asshats in their early twenties, but some of them are still at least trying to be decent humans.

Oh dude, you can totally judge people you don't know for stupid shit that they say! It's really fun and actually kind of the only appropriate/realistic way to live in the world. You should try it out! Here are some pro-tips:

Wow, you are a reductionist. You're not doing any of your causes any favors. . . . .

If it's in fact true that "every interaction [you've] have ever had with trans women has been overwhelmingly negative," I think it could be important to view these interactions within the larger social context in which they are occurring. Trans individuals are a marginalized group, along many parameters. They are

Hi there. . . . I just started reading this thread. I wanted to commend you for addressing the issue in a way that was (to my mind) stringently non-victim-blamey, as well as mindful of the fact that one might not be able to interpret exactly what happened from the video itself. I thought you expressed yourself very

This is so utterly repugnant. I wonder if there is any way to hold MARTA administration accountable for 1) failing to prevent a mass assault and/or 2) failing to respond appropriately. (It seems incorrect to say "respond appropriately" as it seems like they did not respond at all).

I feel so sorry for every American tourist in Paris right now. I can't imagine the Parisians are pleased. . . . .

Dude, if you're gonna wow us with your data, cite it please (are you getting it from a meta-analysis?)—you can't just throw numbers out there as if the numbers themselves are meaningful. I'm pretty sure that, given the time range, we're dealing with some pretty different methodologies here—not to mention a variety of

Oh no, not you again. Dude, nobody here cares about the schlock your 1/2 of a real human brain churns out.

This is everything! Thank you.

You're my new favorite. Thank you for so succinctly taking these chuckleheads down.

I couldn't get past the first season, which I sniggered through with my older brother. Now I'm finally watching the second season and it actually does get a lot better. It helps to have someone to watch it with, preferably someone who likes to make fun of gratuitous sex and incest and dragons.

Yes. That comment is absolutely horrifying. Bleck.

It seems like one could be against certain strains of feminism—and still be a feminist. Like, it seems very reasonable to argue that certain forms of feminism are ignorant to situations faced by minority women—and, at the same time, embrace the forms of feminism that are against taking a woman apart body part by body

I don't think you understand the purpose of the supreme court or the term "constitutional". . . . Again, they interpret the constitution, usually with a 5-4 split. Just because one majority (of five people) determines something to be constitutional, does not mean that another group of of judges/lawyers/people could

That doesn't make sense. You can disagree with the supreme court's interpretation of the constitution. And it's very possible to disagree with the interpretation that the death penalty is not "cruel and unusual."

Just because one supreme court, which is made up of people of varying political dispositions, decides that X is constitutional, does not mean that another supreme court, in another time, comprised of different people, would not deem that X is unconstitutional. (c.f. Note the excellent example given above of Plessy v.

This. A thousand times. Thank you.

Nope. Sorry. You are still using fallacious reasoning and just generally making very little sense. I have no intention of "trying to keep up" with whatever argument you're trying very hard to make. I'm not going to continue to try and explain rape to you—because you just don't get it. I'm outta this conversation.

So "you called it click bait because of they claimed happened silly." Good point! Makes total sense!!!!!