fr33kye
PlatinumGraves
fr33kye

So the wiiu hasn't sold enough to be a priority, okay thank you.

Ahh thank you for the response.

What's not?

Didn't the new call of duty sell more on the unreleased ps4 than the wiiu? Why would you think they'd sell a lot? Is their frostbite engine compatible with the wiiu even? With the ps4 and xbox they are betting that they'll sell more than the wiiu, and that might even bet true before the year is over.

And the pr department may handle ads but an artist probably designed that character well before they knew a publisher would pick them up, so guess what, you have absolutely ZERO way of knowing whether a character was designed in order to get men to pay money, or if an artist liked this character, wanted her in the

" Sex isn't always sexy, and sexy isn't always sex." And who's to make the distinction for all of us? You seem to also claim to know the artist's intention beyond any doubt. "I would rather see it used as a item of art, aware of it's fraught social consequences, an exploration of one of the darker sides to human

"Nobody, child or adult, decides what to be like in a vacuum. Everyone is inspired by someone else, mentored by someone else."

Your post is still just an argument to remove sex from games, movies, all art that's sold. And why is this only applied to sex? Are we not commodifying violence? Human drama? Human suffering? The fact that it's being sold commodifies only the women? Not any of the other characters? How is a woman being sexy make her

Because part of being a grown up is being able to decide for yourself what you believe and who you aspire to be like. So an nba player fucking up doesn't affect you, because you should be intelligent enough to decide if you want to be like him. The same way you are smart enough to decide if you want to play a violent

You're right, time to hide away all the breasts to prove how mature we are. Because liking breasts or sex is for pathetic teenage boys am I right??? Can't wait until we can get rid of all the sex in the industry to reach our optimal level of maturity! And that way we'll make sure that no woman could ever POTENTIALLY

A scantily clad woman promotes sexist stereotypes? Same for a muscular man? Should we run to the beach and cover people up? Should I get a protest sign and stand outside my local gym? I don't want to sound like such a dick but what I think the poster was trying to say, is that nothing has to be for everyone. The truth

"Everything in these games, comics, etc, is designed to appeal to what they believe all men want. All men want vapid useless damsels with huge tits and no clothing. All men want to be Arnold Schwarzenegger. This is what they believe. It's patently wrong, and yet they keep doing it." Proof? Any proof at all that

I already told you what I'm doing! Trying to figure this out! "Despite their moaning about the stagnation and sameness of the games industry, they really do just want to make traditional games." I just want that explained because I don't understand that or its connection between that and kinect/wii.

Kind of seems like I would enjoy this.

I'm just trying to get a vita and tearaway soon.

Humor me and try again, explain that one sentence. Context and all, because I must have missed something. You said " I'm talking about the efforts the publishers and developers always tout that they're honestly reaching out to new audiences or trying to expand the reach of gaming so that it's more broadly accepted and

Did I not quote you directly? "Despite their moaning about the stagnation and sameness of the games industry, they really do just want to make traditional games." Can you explain that? I just want to know what you mean and if you don't know how am I supposed to.

If you can be a little more specific when it comes to publishers and developers that'd be great because I don't really know of any that said anything like that. In my experience it's mostly critics that say things like that, besides them I know of jade raymond and jonathan blow. Blow is making the witness, and jade

I was trying to make sense of some very odd assertions. So please explain:

The wii both created the motion control craze and crippled it from the jump by making the core motion controlling so poor that they had to release motion+. Sony released a better controller for the most part but they half-heartedly support anything that's not their main home console, and it required so many different