Wait just to be clear is there a difference between defending games from bad, wrong ideas that affect how those who don’t know any better perceive games and media, potentially leading to misguided and unfair criticism of games and developers potentially influencing games and thinking games are fragile? I mean…

Man listen, it’s all well and good to want shit, everybody wants shit, and if you’re asking that the games that include black hair to actually make it look good then yeah, but if you in general want more blackness in games, movies, tv, all media, then the focus has to be on removing/fixing the institutions that have…

The biggest reason the vita failed and the reason the 3ds and nintendo in general managed to survive in that space: Sony failed to recognize who handhelds are for.

“we may not have to wait for triple-A developers to wake up” I just hate it when companies and developers don’t spend $40 million and months of their lives on what I want?

You think being a criminal is “black”?

Fuckin sold. I wonder if games like this would have been possible on consoles if sony never gave up on wonderbook? The camera tracking what you do with the book and also picking up your voice for saying spells? I'd be on board for a cool enough game.

LMAO how narcissists want artists and entire industries to bend to their will, more on this in your comments section.

I don't really care for nintendo ip, but it is rough to see nintendo originally design a terrible console, and then make every right move with the XL, 2ds, and the faceplates, while watching Sony originally design the better handheld and one of the best consoles ever, and approach it by vomiting and falling over…

I have no idea what question you're talking about.

" No, that would be called "treating the character with any kind of respect or seriousness"."

I meant sex as in the act, and attraction. And make-up, shaven legs, dresses, even long hair sounds pretty closely related so sex. And men in comic books don't really wear formal wear, they wear brightly colored spandex. Which I would think is not conforming to some platonic ideal of manhood. I mean what fantasy of…

"those bestowed with powers were a more representative sample of the world, with all of its characteristics." like sexuality? Addressing a character's sexuality doesn't negate complexity. And there's not much pandering going on here. If anything pandering would be to change spider-woman's costume completely and…

What are the platonic ideals of womanhood? I had no idea we even had platonic gender ideals. I thought that our ideals of manhood and womanhood were pretty closely related to sex.

Don't worry about the rant at all, I looked up Maleev's work and jesus christ I love his style. I mean his covers for spider-woman #4 and #7? Jesus they are two of the best covers I've ever seen. They are straight up stunning. I mean awesome, like awe inspiring.

Do her tits on one cover erase her skill, power, and bravery on the other pages? That doesn't answer the question of how to draw a sexual character without expressing some contempt for women.

Ohhh I understand now, I appreciate that. Though then it'd still be inaccurate to say they went to a porn artist when it came to drawing spider-woman, while everyone else gets the usual artists right? They went to an erotica artist for the variant cover, which while it may be intended to be the most desired, it's not…

"The point is that this is NOT one character on one cover one time. " So the cover itself is not an example of objectification then right?

1. I don't think they did show off her ass in every picture, and the controversy seems to be focusing on this one picture not ones in the issue. And the spine thing, eh. Depending on your perspective it's actually not that unrealistic, but even if it is they are often pretty loose with realism, even when it comes to…

1. So every page, every picture of spider-woman has to be her using super powers or mid-fight otherwise she's being objectified? Things appear to be exaggerated for sex appeal but is she not climbing on top of a building above the city in full costume in that picture? Couldn't we argue that her as a hero has not been…

But wouldn't someone make the argument that in the scene she's climbing? Her position is likely exaggerated for sex appeal, but she is clearly climbing onto the building. She's actual mid action, and objects don't act. The difference between objectification and sexy is whether it makes sense in the context of the…