I thought about it, but honestly, for half if not more of potential buyers in 2025, the auto will be a plus.

For not much more than you would pay for some generic runner, you could have this. Why not? NP.

For me this is a case of rare ≠ desirable–at least not $7.5K desirable for a tired-looking, high-mileage example. ND.

The front looks like if RR decided to build a pickup.

I was on the fence, and then I saw the “Klean Ridez” license plate frame. Nope.

I went ND but could have gone either way. With this you’re accepting the packaging compromises of a crossover without getting the 4WD. On the other hand, where this is you probably don’t need 4WD, and you’re getting relative simplicity and Toyota reliability. I dunno, can I change my vote?

This looks better than it has any right to, although the bed feels a bit industrial, and the OCD among us won’t like how the taillights are offset from the black stripe on the gate. But it’s still a Charger under there, and that’s too much money for the miles on it. ND.

While some dealers will back out these extra charges in order to make a sale,

I have exactly zero woodworking skills, so my son’s first Derby car looked like the work of a meth-addled beaver. The second time around, we got smart and did a Sponge Bob car. A crowd favorite and surprisingly competitive. Aero doesn’t mean much at Derby speeds.

VICIOUS LIMITED SLIP DIFFERENTIAL

Could this be the No-Diciest week ever? Stay tuned!

I was on the fence, but seeing as it’s gone, NP, I guess. I was a little skeptical of the owner’s rationale for selling, but on the other hand, Bay area pricing.

It all looks a little slapdash, honestly. The top has that Worst Tent at the Boy Scout Jamboree look, and the leather on the seats looks ill-fitting. I also have a very limited appetite for gold trim or accessories of any kind on a car, especially a red one. And the mechanicals don’t sound all that special. ND.

Nothing says reliable like three binders of records for 213K miles. At 248K, the records for my 2010 Pilot would have fit comfortably in one of those binders.

Probably more like a committee drew it up and every member disowned the result.

Great first car for a kid. Even the goofy decals would look perfectly at home in any high school parking lot.

Not sure how I feel about spewing soot from an old diesel into the atmosphere in this day and age. But I wouldn’t judge the person who wants it, and there should be plenty at this price. NP.

Yeah, not even necessarily a knock on the previous owner. If it was driven as intended, it’s seen some hard use.

Seems like pa-ing through the noz for a different way to die.

If you weren’t alive back then, it may be hard to grasp what a thunderclap this design was at the time. Visually speaking, it was a bit like the arrival of the Taurus just a decade later. Of course, GM let the downsized B-bodies–especially the Caprice/Impala–steal the Seville’s thunder the very next year.