it’s the same type of game yes but it was made by different dev with their own code/engine. What Bethesda is suing here, is not that the westworld game is the same type of game as fallout shelter, it’s that the westworld game use the exact same code and engine as the fallout one. Basically Behaviour did a copy/past of…

Why? People every where work to change some aspect of their lives. Is okay for someone to want a different job, work out for toning reasons, obtain some kind of award, or get sex changes? They are all huge changes to a person’s life that require huge commitments. If they aren’t happy with their current circumstances…

Yeah, but question asker needs to be veeery careful because an abuser’s #1 go-to is to drive off their victims’s friends. George *should* be driven off, but because of A’s background, new boyfriend probably should not be the one to do it.

Only Scotland currently has a law on the books criminalizing upskirting.

I’m kidding, you don’t understand sarcasm

This is why I don’t understand Autopilot. If it “requires” you to be 100% attentive, hands on the wheel, foot at the ready to smash the brake - then what is the freaking point at all? It’s completely and utterly hopeless and useless.

It almost stops. It’s a low speed collision that should not cause any harm to the passengers.

The important questions are left unasked: Where can one purchase an inflatable Ford Fiesta, and will it float if filled with Helium?

especially given his religious background, there is symbolism to washing your feet with another man. and rogers would have intended it.

I honestly don’t find it that troubling, given the context of the time period. If Rogers were alive today and urging gay men to marry women as hopes that it would somehow make it better, then it would be troubling.

IMHO one of the very rare TRUE Christians in television.

“Rogers’s rhetoric was flimsier...”
I disagree 200%. Half of America still fights to make it legal to fire someone for being gay, and its still done in what, 30 states? Maybe 5% of churches are LGBT friendly, and i doubt its that many.
To hear Rogers talking like that in the 60s is unfathomable.
Obama didn’t even come…

An openly gay cast member on a children’s show would have been an issue ten years ago let alone in 1968.

He did pragmatically admit the reality of the situation. If he kept going out to gay bars, he’d get outed and fired. That was the reality and completely out of Roger’s hands.

This. I’m old enough to remember that until 1969, the men arrested in police nuisance raids of gay bars would have their names published in the daily newspaper, often resulting in losing jobs. Rogers wasn’t rejecting him - he was looking out for him (and the show). Also worth noting that the marriage-for-appearances…

I agree that you can’t call this homophobia on Rogers part (imho). He didn’t reject Clemmons, quite the opposite. He did pragmatically admit the reality of the situation. If he kept going out to gay bars, he’d get outed and fired. That was the reality and completely out of Roger’s hands. The ending of the article in…

Yes, this exactly. I don’t see these “cracks”. Especially with this quote from Mr. Rogers about Clemmons, “Many of the wrong people will get the worst idea, and we don’t want them thinking and talking about you like that.” i.e., many folks would call Clemmons a pedophile just because he was gay. It really seems like…

I have seen a couple of sites trying to make a fuss out of this and say that homophobia was some sort of skeleton in Fred Rogers’ closet. But that is really judging people of half a century ago by the morality of today. It is amazing that Clemmons wasn’t fired. Gay people (especially men) around children was regarded…

But still, it illustrates the finite nature of Mr. Rogers’s ideals. “I like you just the way you are,” he often said, but in the case of Clemmons there was a caveat: “...I just need you to show less of the way you are.” This information through the lens of contemporary culture, in which an employer legislating what…

Wait. A. Minute...