festivusazili
festivusazili
festivusazili

From the piece:

“Beyond comments to The Post, Trump representatives have not provided records of stock transactions or other details since the May filing.

One thing I do agree with the columnist on is that at this point, he’s going to be President.

Because we actually know for certain where Trump’s financial interests lie thanks to his voluminous and transparent financial disclosu - wait, what? Oh, we don’t? Oh.

In other words, presidents do things for reasons, so what the fuck does it matter what those reasons are? Makes complete sense.

“On the flip side, at least the press and political opposition will find it easy to police Mr. Trump’s business conflicts compared with many other conflicts that presidents are heir to.”

Like touting that $50 billion Softbank investment in exchange for Justice Department approval for their acquisition of T-Mobile.

Yes, never. The rules of the election were set beforehand. Ours are not great. The candidate with the most votes does not always win. But that is our system. Having 538 people change the system after the fact is a disaster that our country would not recover from. It’s basically advocating for a civil war.

I do know what it means.

The left has shown itself to be as equally deplorable as the right.

Here’s where I know my liberal brothers are frustrated:

Thank you. FFS.

The take and the username? Funniest thing I’ve ever seen on Kinja. You get a star.

Now playing

YOOOOUUUUU AND MMAAAEEEEE. MAAAEEEEEEEE AND YOOOOUUUUUUUU

Now playing

Nothing will top the trailer for the shitty Lifetime Brittany Murphy biopic.

The reason you start with a hot pan is if you use a cold one the oil gets sopped up by whatever you’re intending to cook, instead of being cooked by that oil. This makes food greasy (not like a nice flavorful grease either, just limp and oily) and significantly degrades the flavor. Get that shit hot enough to sizzle

two wrongs totally make a right though

True, but why do we always hold the women responsible for these decisions? This law does not target men to be persuaded to feminism, it targets women to be scorned and humiliated in public.

I’d be OK with banning trilbys.

Idk about atheist and feminist, but you’re definitely a troll.