Nintendo.

Not only that, but the manufacturers and shippers of those 0s and 1s have strict limits as to what they can manufacture and deliver!!

I swear, Earthbound was the ONLY game I was interested in using my coins for.

You can’t make this stuff up.

Nintendo needlessly limiting stock? Get the FUCK out!

now that seems fun as shit. i never get into good lobbies in GTA Online, it’s always random assholes that will roll up on you and gun you down so fast, you’d swear there was a million dollar bounty on you.

PC will push the limit even further.

It is, 100%, to keep people from complaining to corporate. See, what people don't realize is, you will totally get something free for complaining to corporate. However, I'd bet that the person you just complained about will lose their job over the complaint.

"Who touched Sasha!?"

Yeah, I didn’t just mean Joe, hence “people” not “person”.

That’s not how copyright works. Derivative works like this are covered under fair use. Notice how no other company does anything like this? It’s because they know it’d be legally indefensible. Nintendo is just a bully and is banking on the fact that nobody is going to have the money and power to stand up to their…

Hey Nintendo,

Why do people watch sports instead of play them? To be fair most game youtubers are commentators, reviewers, and sometimes story tellers. So you might want to know if a game is even worth buying, or maybe you just want to have someone telling jokes and they just so happen to be playing games. Many let’s plays are…

Managers who don't stand up for their employees are THE WORST.

I'm proud to be an American, where at least I know my cheddar biscuits will be free. And I won't forget the men who died, so I can bitch about automatic gratuity.

I fail to see how it’s meaningfully different than what you see in traditional media outlets. Of course, your opinion may be that all video game coverage is garbage, Kotaku included, but we’ll just have to disagree there. Just because YouTube is full of low-quality stuff doesn’t mean there aren’t people doing really…

Just like that damn Siskel and Ebert. May they burn in hades.

I understand you are not able to use someone’s products and likeness to profit, however, when someone is watching someone like Angry Joe, they are watching it for him, not the reviewed product. He is the product. The corporate attitude that no one can use their name or product is akin to saying if Jerry Seinfeld has a…

Bomber jackets, and indulging in photography while driving from the sunroof.

Except that’s not an ‘83. They looked like this in ‘83.