Don’t you mean Ready To Race ??? :)

Your thoughts are still stuck about a decade behind. The industry is seeing a massive shift with regards to fuel content and subsequent engine emissions.

IZUZU? Blasphemy! It’s Isuzu.

Ships put out less grams of CO2 per tonne km than ANY other from of cargo transportation. The larger the vessel, the more efficient it is.

Probably make a fun track/auto cross car on the cheap for a Porsche.

Is it better at the 100m parking lot dash or the highway rush hour hurdles?

I think it kind of looks like Marvin

I don’t have a lot of information on the damage but from what I’ve read my thoughts are this:

Correct, I probably should have mentioned the name as well of just the phenomenon.

I believe you’re remembering the MS Estonia in the Baltic Sea.

Will it fit in an elevator diagonally and or is it easy to wheel up?

I’m GLaD OS comment was made.

It’s a compromised design in terms of vessel safety. And yes it’s unfortunately kind of the only way to do it without a crazy amount of added cost to the design and significant loss of cargo space and turn around time.

Canada: 4 years full-time, year round apprenticeship. IMO certified for Manila 2010 regs.

I appreciate the sediment but you’re talking with Scotty here. :)

Yes. Where the water is put has an effect on vessel stability. The higher that water is, the less it will need to capsize. As I said it takes a lot less than one would think.

Marine Engineer here.

LOL, I’d be lucky to get half of that with my 2005 Corolla XRS that has less than 1/3 the mileage and doesn’t have a dank ass hood. This isn’t an AE86.

I don’t think people realize that just because an electric motor has less moving parts doesn’t mean it can’t or won’t shit the bed one day with normal use. Windings go, bearings go, diodes and rectifiers, that’s normal after some time of use of any loaded motor/alternator. Anyone who’s spend time dealing with…

The Frank Costanza restraint system!