With most people, that would be inexplicable. With a member of the Trump administration, it was probably because he pocketed the $80, needed a lie to explain why he had nothing to show for it, and blamed the incivility of the left.

The driver was a twit, but those pumps were faulty, too. Those hoses are designed to break away without continuing to spray gas everywhere. It’s damn lucky an empty car was sitting there and not a van full of kids.

But why would someone who refuses to eat on camera agree to be a judge on a cooking show? That’s like signing up for the Amazing Race and refusing to travel.

Which, in turn, will lead to people driving around with shaving mirrors duct taped to their broken cameras. I look forward to that. I really do.

...and if he’s wrong some charity gets a million dollars.

A standard doctorate isn’t as meaningless as one in “leadership”.

11 years? Damn. You can buy a doctorate for $19.99 that would get you the same number of eye rolls.

He can team with Drew Carey.

I didn’t think you were attacking anything. It just reads like you are defending the practice of having groceries delivered. It seemed odd since nobody has taken issue with that. Not here, anyway.

So if child support comes out of a government paycheck, is that kid now a government employee? Where an employee’s money goes has nothing to do with the employer. I’ve already addressed the other half of your argument.

Grammar is for Nazis.

Super Mario Bros. I was so happy to not see Toad. It was a real “orange you glad I didn’t say banana?” moment.

Why are you defending something nobody is attacking?

For some reason, every time someone in the Trump administration opens their mouth I flash back to that video of Gaddafi getting stabbed in the asshole.

If you wasted a package of those tiny, delicious, powdered donuts the cop would absolutely kill you.

Every place I have ever worked that was investigated by OSHA (more than enough to be too many) has gotten two weeks notice that the inspectors were coming. Never enough time to fix the problems, but more than enough time to try to hide the problems. It was always fairly pointless. The only thing that was ever…

I laugh when I do something stupid and hurt myself. Why shouldn’t I laugh when someone else does? Laughing at someones misfortune isn’t nice, but stupidity isn’t misfortune. Luck isn’t self-inflicted.

My question was whether “That is a textbook version of a first amendment issue” like skeffles claims. I never doubted that it was censorship.