I didn’t think you were attacking anything. It just reads like you are defending the practice of having groceries delivered. It seemed odd since nobody has taken issue with that. Not here, anyway.
I didn’t think you were attacking anything. It just reads like you are defending the practice of having groceries delivered. It seemed odd since nobody has taken issue with that. Not here, anyway.
So if child support comes out of a government paycheck, is that kid now a government employee? Where an employee’s money goes has nothing to do with the employer. I’ve already addressed the other half of your argument.
Grammar is for Nazis.
Super Mario Bros. I was so happy to not see Toad. It was a real “orange you glad I didn’t say banana?” moment.
Why are you defending something nobody is attacking?
For some reason, every time someone in the Trump administration opens their mouth I flash back to that video of Gaddafi getting stabbed in the asshole.
If you wasted a package of those tiny, delicious, powdered donuts the cop would absolutely kill you.
Every place I have ever worked that was investigated by OSHA (more than enough to be too many) has gotten two weeks notice that the inspectors were coming. Never enough time to fix the problems, but more than enough time to try to hide the problems. It was always fairly pointless. The only thing that was ever…
I laugh when I do something stupid and hurt myself. Why shouldn’t I laugh when someone else does? Laughing at someones misfortune isn’t nice, but stupidity isn’t misfortune. Luck isn’t self-inflicted.
My question was whether “That is a textbook version of a first amendment issue” like skeffles claims. I never doubted that it was censorship.
But I get it, I do. If you’re just incredibly busy and have no free time whatsoever to take care of a little task like this, why should gas delivery be any sillier than, say, two-hour grocery delivery?
I’m not saying it isn’t censorship, or that the union is right, or that they have any business getting involved in this in the first place. I’m not even saying it definitely isn’t a first amendment issue. I am wondering whether the police union itself (which, in theory, exists in opposition to the government rather…
Just say it’s where Greenland meets Canada. It isn’t, but people won’t question it.
For the record, I’m not saying they definitely don’t represent the government. I’m saying they don’t definitely represent the government. It’s not a textbook first amendment issue. It’s a fuzzy one.
A steelworkers union represents the people who represent the steel mills. That doesn’t mean they represent the steel mills. It is pretty much the opposite.
Doubtful. They can’t point out any other country we’ve bombed.
Does he want to bring the 80s back or does the sundowning pudknob think they’re still happening?
Would a police union be considered to be part of the government? I mean, police unions are corrupt, bigoted, and actively harmful to society, and that all points to “yes”. But they aren’t taxpayer funded. Maybe, despite their membership, they’re more of an independent “NRA” kind of evil.
Agreed. To my mind, these... things... don’t even qualify as hot dogs. They’re just small bologna.