This isn’t going to be the norm, regardless what some of the so-called “experts” may say so there’s some satisfaction in that.
This isn’t going to be the norm, regardless what some of the so-called “experts” may say so there’s some satisfaction in that.
The last 7 drives of the game had 3 punts, 2 interceptions, and 2 touchdowns...
A 27-24 game would likely have been decided by whichever team got the ball last...
Those damn sjws, always buying all the athletic apparel!
If this leads to fewer white suburban dads stuffing their fat asses in fake workout gear, I’m calling it a win
That’s how Bill O’Reilly and Ann Coulter stay on the bestseller list selling books to people who don’t read
I don’t know, they are a bunch of fucking morons.
Which was immediately followed by their stock reaching record highs.
You must be lost. Let me help you: foxnews.com
Sometimes, doing the right thing, for the wrong reasons, and getting some credit for it, might make you more inclined to do the right thing, next time. Like, if I make my daughter help an old lady across the street, even if she’d rather play Pokemon Go, and she gets a nice thank you and a hug, maybe it will help…
I have worked for Nike in more than one division for over 20 years, (nothing high level, but high enough), and I do not feel at all comfortable with what you’re saying here. Nike stood by Lance Armstrong until a final full breach of contract was made. Nike stood by Tiger through a collapse that PR execs could have…
Yeah, I mean. All of this was obviously true from day one. Even so, it’s fair to judge them by their actions. In the corporate world we pass judgment not by the intent of the speaker but by the effect on the listener. We judge by received effect. By that metric, Nike did a good.
I am shocked - shocked! -to find that gambling is going on in here!
What is surprising about any of this? Why would it be shocking that a sportswear company considered ending its marketing arrangement with a man who was no longer affiliated with any sort of professional sports team.
What’s kind of obnoxious, though, is that Nike (rightly) catches shit for this being a cynical business move, but Kaepernick catches precisely none for taking their money. If Nike is only really in this to sell more shoes and be on “the right side” in some shallow PR game (this is certainly true), then Kaepernick is…
So wait. A top 5 global brand, was not actually interested in the message its selling? It was actually only worried about its own image and making money to further expand that brand??
And then it also turns out, Nike contributes millions to Republican candidates. The timing can’t be a coincidence, and it is absolute brilliance on their part, because conservatives really are this stupid.
Report: Nike is a for-profit corporation
It’s almost as if Nike is a business, and their primary objective is to make as much money as possible.
I always enjoy when someone does a “report” about the most basic shit that everyone in the world already knows (not a shot at you Chris - at the report). Report: Children frustrate adults. Wow, thanks for all that amazing journalistic work to bring up this report.