Is it because her name is thrasher?

Wait, which end?

The article may have had something to say about that.

Wait, being a drug-addled jerk has pitfalls?

I feel like a movie with that title would be about something else.

What does his cat think about abortion?

I keep saying this on here, but Hootie's first album, at least all the singles off it (which I believe are all I've heard), is really, really good. Tight as shit, some genuine emotion, serious hooks, what's not to like?

So long as it doesn't involve rapping, or anything that I am interested in, it's all good.

Yes.

Eh, he's not that articulate.

There's definitely a bikini joke here, but I'm too lazy to figure it out.

I'm 40, and have seen every one of the MCU films, and will continue to. There is no hope for you.

Other than a cutthroat game of Carcassonne with my father and kids last night (none of whom had ever played it before) and the occasional half-hearted run through Binding of Isaac (finally finished an entire post-it note - Cain's), I'm not really playing anything these days, as I've been travelling, working, and now…

One of my favourite issues. I like a lot of the one-shots, actually.

If I understand your claim, it’s that we shouldn’t try to do anything about anything because of global warming and damage to the environment, and anyone who does try to do anything about anything is wasting their time.
I think that’s silly.

If what you say is true, it’s not worth saying. So you should stop saying it. That’s the only “insight” (which I suppose I first had in clarity when I read Horkheimer and Adorno). I don’t believe that what you say is true, so it’s fine for me to keep talking.

If it’s all so pointless, why even bother talking about it? The only methods that have ever accomplished anything, in all of human history, are imperfect ones. If nothing short of perfection will save us, then we are genuinely screwed, as you argue. But in which case, you might as well live your life as well as you…

“Sole” isn’t a good substitution for “only". “Not more than” is better, as in “That does not mean anything more than reduced by ten percent.” Which is, I think, what was originally meant, not “ten percent and ten percent only”.

Agreed. But my point is that dealing with the problems that have arisen since the Reagan/Thatcher revolutions does not require the total disengagement from the levers of power that the comment I replied to was advocating. Quite the opposite.

Just to keep it pedantic, placing only after by changes the meaning of the sentence, and its original placement is better for conveying @avclub-9b7b0109c992b2904b1cb4640cebc223:disqus's actual meaning.