ellehel
ElleHel
ellehel

Doesn’t matter, they’d all be wasting their time.

This is one of (if not THE) big one. I live almost centrally located in my (admittedly small) city, but people actively move to my area for the one good “city” school that’s here.

Nah. Just train yourself to say “nibble” or “nugget.”

Why should the president be involved in a petty theft case? Should this president or any other give two shits?

Your point sucks shit. What do you suppose the passage about how hard it is to be a journalist who knows things about sexual assault that you can’t report was in reference to, extremely angry guy? Can you put two and two together and figure out that the Jez writers knew this was more than rumor a long time ago? I get

Frankly, I think the appeal to misogyny is simply symptomatic of this poor kid’s intrinsic sociopathic manipulative streak. When caught, sociopaths typically have some reasonable sounding reason for the behavior, but under close scrutiny, it doesn’t hold up.

You got it mixed up.

It’s “mea culpa” you head ass

Here’s the simple fact: It’s The New York Times

I’m not sure why you’re bringing up the Washington Post? The New York Times broke the story earlier this morning — two different cities, two completley different media outlets.

Well that would be surprising, because arguments that just consist of four pictures are usually really convincing.

Yo, serious question: You seem to be butthurt about these protests and you seem to think that all protesters are doing it to diss the American military complex. Do you guys just not hear why they’re protesting on purpose, or because you’re a white dude and you let yourself get hyped up by FoxNews, that’s why you’re

Dressing weird and loudly disrupting are totally the same thing as dressing appropriately and quietly protesting in a way that disturbs no one. Totally the same thing.

First, you would not be peaceful if purposely disturbing a sermon in a church. Peaceful is defined as free from disturbance. NFL players are not disturbing anybody, they are minding their own business.

Nothing you said there in anyway indicates that the National Anthem or Flag are specifically tied to the military. These players aren’t going to where Veterans specifically congregate, unlike your ridiculous church example, they’re protesting at their own workplace. In front of thousands of fans from all walks of

Yes, their “personal political cause” of please stop letting police kill black people with no repercussions. Pretty much the same as wanting a fucking McRib.

You missed the point of the article. You didn’t need anyone to teach you because you’re motivated for the sport, which is likely because you had an interest in one.

As a black man living in America, I feel the NFL protests appropriately draw attention to one of America’s gravest race-based sins at a venue that makes it uncomfortably difficult for those either apathetic to or complicit in it to ignore.

Agreed, he doesn’t speak for all Vets. I don’t feel that slap in the face he describes when they kneel or raise a fist. The National Anthem doesn’t represent me anymore than it does a 70 year old draft dodger who is offended by the protests of it. It represents all of us as a whole and anyone in this country who feels

Someone needs to remind these clowns that the protests have nothing to do with them, and that the flag is not specifically about the military.