Squeeeee!!

This might be the best comment I have ever read.

I can’t believe the number of people who (at least pretend to) have no idea that big conferences pay big names to come talk to make the company look important. It’s a giant circle jerk and it is NOT where the sausage gets made.

How about...this bitch:

I’m kinda loving Aubrey’s Cruella hair.

No thanks. I'm just going to use Kylie's butt/boobs cream.

The content belongs to her either way. But that’s a moot point. Goldman Sachs would own a recording, but a copy of a contract of a speech she gave elsewhere, which is public record, stipulates that no recordings are allowed. It also stipulates that a stenographer be supplied in order to create a transcript for her.…

Habitat for Huge Manatees.

He is incredibly strange with some wonderful ideas. (7:37 is when Vermin shows up)

We should all be so lucky.

Thank you for reminding me I have bacon.

Now I really want a BLT.

At this point I’m thinking Hillary is pretty much bullet proof. She’s faced more scrutiny and unfair characterizations of her no male politician has ever faced. She holds up. She’s a tough broad and it’s hard not to root for her because of what she has faced. Hillary can play the game with the best of them.

Really? A “pivotal importance”? To the Sanders campaign, maybe. Pretty disappointed that this absurd double-standard is only mentioned in the article as a Clinton campaign talking point. This is a standard that we have never held any politician to before.

Should I be offended

I can’t tell if this is exactly was Steinem was saying or the exact opposite of what she was saying...

Don’t cry because it’s over, cry because I’m going to grey the shit out of everyone before I go.