elephant1232
Elephant1232
elephant1232

Ok. So the proverbial "good guy with a gun" might be able to stop a hijacking in process (how many of those have we had in the last 13 years, by the way?), so I wonder how you propose to decide who the good guys are that get to bring their guns and knives on the plane.

Meanwhile, former NBAer Anthony Mason might die. Seriously.

I agree with your larger point, but there are 7 players with as many rings or more than Horry.

Growing up, Oak was my absolute favorite basketball player. As an adult, Guitar Jimmy is my least favorite, privileged, shitstain.

"Analytics is a nice tool but oddly enough coaches and GMs were able to succeed long before the analytic trend caught on."

Do you have any proof of this, or is it just something you simply believe to be true?

So, you're telling me the ends justify the means?

Never be the guy who says, "Man, that was the worst 9 I've played in a while. I never hit them like this."

These are some of the worst kayfabes I've ever seen.

James Dolan defies electrophysics by being repulsive to everybody.

Well, that rules out legal reform, then. I guess the only thing left for people to do is stop consuming the work of the paparazzi. If demand disappears, the suppliers will close up shop forever.

"Whether or not people crave celebrity news gives no right to paps chasing after someone for photos."

Agreed. I was excited to see the Pats manage 1st and 10 from behind their own 1 with 20 sec remaining.

You're correct that outlawing invasive photography would destroy paparazzi, even if the demand for celebrity gossip endured. And if that hypothetical law ever came to pass, you'd also be right that paparazzi would deserve blame if they continued to produce their product. However, this hypothetical is just that - a

Your argument is spurious because it attempts to conflate black markets (organs, drugs and child porn) with the legal product of celebrity photos and gossip. You're also attacking a straw man since nobody besides you has ever made the argument that child porn should be legal on the basis that there's a demand for it.

What does that crayon analogy mean?!?

Thanks for the link. That's a dumb and offensive thing to say but I don't find it racist.

Racist?

I never got the John Mayer hate, but the guy sure didn't look too comfortable up there.

Why do we not use bidets? It baffles me.