Well, they probably figure they’re saving money by having that person not show and just having people work the shift short. Reminds me of an assisted living I worked at where we pretty much got in trouble for replacing someone who had called in. They admonished us for solving the problem of working short because they…

Yeah, I hope there’s language in the laws about covering shifts for sickness, “Sickness”, and other emergencies.

And, with Trump, I sometimes wonder if it’s a falsehood he’s knowingly stating, he’s so dumb that he doesn’t know the real answer, or his mind is slipping due to age/STDs that he doesn’t know anymore.

Nah, they’re just looking for someone to blame so they can raise rates for their own profit without looking bad.

There could possibly be ways to address this while still not asserting he’s lying, or they could actually do it in opinion pieces (they really should). Instead, most of these fucking dipshits will just repeat his claims, often in headlines, without referencing the fact that there’s no evidence for them until they do…

Drive up hotel rates relative to what?  Other hotels?  Do they think that people are going to drive to NJ rather than pay the extra $0.30 that a predicable schedule will cost?  What nonsense.

I get it too, but I wish they’d be less flowery about how (and if) they communicate that what he said is false. Like, all they have to do is say “Trump says XYZ, which is not true.” WaPo is actually a little better about this than other publications but I just want it to be bluntly stated. 

When the lie reaches 10 Pinocchios, it’s a Strike Pinocchio! 50 is a Golden Pinocchio! When he tells one lie to cover up another lie, it’s a Double Decker Pinocchio. If he tells the lie that conflicts with another lie because he forgot what happened before, it’s a Geriatric Pinocchio. If he tells a lie while tweeting…

That’s “Liar in Chief”, thank you very much...

This is the difference between evil republicans and spineless Democrats and why voting for Democrats, even when the better candidate may have lost the Democratic primary, is so important in our two party system. The Democratic wing of the Democratic Party can push the spineless “center” to occasionally do the correct…

I bet Schumer is sitting in his office wondering what that imaginary constituent family thinks about this.

I suggest Milo Yiannapoulus. No, seriously. He’s flat broke. He’s available. Trump can scream “YOU FUCKING FAGGOT!”* at him and Milo will call him “Dadsy” or something like that.

Way too many lines are being crossed here.

Anyone qualified to be the White House's Chief of Staff is smart enough not to want the job. And vice versa 

The only reason that true believer Gavin McInnes doesn’t have the job is Trump is worried that he is a better dresser than himself.

I, too, enjoy commenting before reading the article.

I think Trump is going to opt to use a two man Chief of Staff system:

We Have No Idea Who Trump’s Next Chief of Staff Will Be

You guessed it: Frank Stallone.

Pence joined the trump ticket because he was considered too much of a creepy right-wing loon for Indiana.