Thank you for this. These are the kinds of stories we should be learning and teaching in school.

This is it exactly. They’re attempting to come back, but there isn’t any real hint of even understanding what it is they’ve done wrong or why it’s wrong. There’s no indication they’re at all interested in changing their ways or learning from this experience, or even really acknowledging the situation, or even really…

I’m a little disappointed the Weisselberg news only ended up in Dirt Bag. I’ve been waiting for an article on it all day, but...well, better Dirt Bag than nothing.

Buffy itself fits this example. The original movie didn’t do well at all but as we’ve seen, the series that rebooted the concept did quite well.

And here I thought it was 90's nostalgia causing the resurgence.

I’m not going to lie, I’m not a fan of how the character was written (then again, I have that complaint about half the movie) but hearing about how flat out excited and thrilled she was about it actually made me like the character a little more.

I truly thought that was going to be a play on “Banana Republic” in there somewhere, since that comparison would fit almost as well.

That’s my discomfort as well. Every once in a while, they do the right thing for the right reasons.

He’s been here over 60 years, is 94 years old, the process took 14 years to complete and they’re trying to actually take credit for this as some sort of awesome “look what we did, this proves we’re not like them” proof?

I adore the new box design.

I would also like to have words with whoever thought that font was acceptable.

It’s tough to write a narrative about a couple of Lone Heroes when they didn’t actually do it all themselves, and doesn’t fit the narrative.

Agreed. When the reporter is explaining why Ross wasn’t included, he uses terms such as “inclusion in the narrative.” I don’t want to go so far as to say he approached the story with a certain mindset and goal, but...the terms people use to describe and defend their decisions can be telling, and it’s clear she didn’t…

My impression of Title IX was always that it was meant to help curb and limit abuse where those kinds of protections are not sufficiently present.

It’s true I missed a lot of the “retrospective” slant of the article, but that could be because I’m not nearly so optimistic. I half expect that we will be Republic of Gilead or a smoking crater in fifteen years.

Nope. Not having it, NYT.

Oh, boo hoo. Hopefully Musk has some $100 bills around to wipe his tears with.

Every time there’s any mention anywhere of “dark side of the moon” I immediately launch into song. The best part is that most of the people around me pick it up just as quickly.

So by creating this simplistic binary he is stating his belief that the rule of law, by his definition, is fascistic.

This is my take. Although I think it has less to do about loneliness rather than making sure everyone is fully aware of his own self-aggrandized ego.