While I know the MP component is the main draw of this game, this makes me worry that the campaign will not be particularly strong.

Don’t fret about buying cheep/disposable fast fashion. Once you have kids, expensive clothes are only there to get ruined by the little bastards (unless you are the type of wealth that can pay for full time help).

Exactly what I was thinking.

I’m looking very much forward to the next one. It seems, by the little bit we were shown, that they have expanded the abilities and the world it exists in, while (perhaps I’m assuming too much) adding some depth to the story with the multi-character aspect.

Yes, its good. One of the top tier, end of the platform generation games that came out. Although, if you can PC it, I would recommend over PS3. Both work fine, and art style helps the old system look good, but CPU dishonored is visually stunning.

By “how long” you mean only about 1/2-3/4 a year (please don’t get delayed!)

The part about Kelly being unable to handle his star players follows the standard line of criticism, calling Kelly’s offense “vanilla” is a fresh one, and perhaps the meanest thing you can say about a guy whose whole schtick is being an innovator on the offensive end. That’s like looking Guy Fieri dead in his face and…

I love it. I want to be this excited about anything.

I’m just here to talk about “boots guy” on the right of the splash image.

“I mean we have top down isometric RPGs like Baldur’s Gate and Divinity: Original Sin which are not turn based RPGs”

I don’t think they want to “cash in” on a Tactics game, as much as take advantage of the lower base cost of producing one. Consider, that much of the higher developing costs would be already taken care of, in that they can pull most of the assets and animations form Inquisition, much like Inquisition took many of the…

What it lacks in character development or dialogue is instead focused into countdown and progression based resource management.

Finish Divinity, pick up this after. Both are great for differing reasons, but you’d be better off not not having to reestablish and remind yourself where you were in (really, in either of them).

I game on a combo of Sony devices/PC, and this covers me for nearly every non-[Nintendo exclusive] game out there. Due to my digital legacy and purchase history amongst the two I probably wont be changing over anytime soon.

If this version speeds up the battle load in over the original version (which had a long animation to cover disc loading), then I would be quite happy with this version.

I find both Simms and Buck suffer from not being able to finish a thought, changing subject constantly mid sentence. Drives me crazy.

Nantz is ok. Simms is unbelievably terrible (he is in the Joe Buck and John Gruden level of bad).

If you can find a longer version of the hit, it shows how right before how he ends up getting his head whipped hard into the side glass. I believe dude was out to lunch when he then went and checked the lineman. His brain was a broken egg on drugs, like the old commercial.

Does this count?

Failure doesn’t necessarily mean a bad game. Failure can also mean spending too much money or time pre- and during production, and either not recouping or generating the desired profit margin. If its’ profit to expenses ratio was not to their liking, then it would be considered a failure.