This has a Class IV hitch and the tow package. Hitches are no longer regularly made, and tow package cars are hard to come by. Nice price. Towing is what these are great for....you can have a car and still pull a Chris-Craft

As someone who works at a dealer, I basically think we can do whatever we with trade-ins, because we’re offering to write a check. Up to you.  I don’t lowball people, but there are many reasons (your car’s accident on its CarFax included) why your trade-in may be less than you think it is. 

I NP’ed this one. It is cool and perfect as-is in kind of a Hank Moody sort of way. And, my attitude would be as such, “Do I care that its perfect? Hell no. Do YOU have a Lotus? No? Then sit down, sir. Because, I do.”

Gremlins were really not bad cars. They were just fugly and memorable.

I have a wooden boat. Not as pretty as that, but it also gets used every weekend. It gets pulled by a 2005 Highlander with 210k. But I digress.

The only benefit I see to a higher seating position is I’ve found that I have less pain in my lower back—-which has become a problem in my R129 and W205 because I think I’m more chairlike sitting up. Example—either of the cars I listed above, I start having lower back pain after an hour. I can drive my AMC Eagle or my…

When I was young, and it was nearing the end of the Firebird, I first saw this movie (think early 2000's). I was immediately obsessed with CB radios and desperately wanted a Trans Am. And, that was 20 YEARS after it was made. It made me appreciate Jackie Gleason. It allowed me later on to discover the musical genius…

Thats the coolest Astro I’ve ever seen. And, I mean that.....I’m kind of in love with it. 

I have a 1993 500SL. It is in 90% perfect condition (a few cracks in the leather, the front under apron is scraped) but everything is perfectly functioning (unusual on these cars). Another commenter was correct...average a few thousand dollars a year to drive these.

Actually it was originally an Edsel

I do think though, that this IS granted to the Federal Government under the Commerce Clause. If the government thinks California is fucking up the national market, they can intervene.

Are you sure this wasn’t a deviation in payoff? I see this happen but usually it is because a payoff was unable to be obtained for whatever reason.

Wow...as I have been selling new cars since 2006...lets see:

I’d drive one!

It used to be common-place for auto makers to offer a “California Edition”. I’ve long said that they should NOT be able to create their own rules because of the Commerce Clause. They are affecting interstate commerce by doing so. With us being car people, this will open up car design. Mercedes’s literally look the way…

When gas went to $4/gallon, I wisely continued to drive my paid-for, 2001 Lincoln Continental. Weird car. Cobra engine (Good!!), Taurus transmission (BAD!!!). Like, I said, it was paid for and I didn’t create more negative equity by paying sticker for a Yaris. But, I digress. I work in the business. I sell cars. These…

I may have to buy a Lincoln Continental sooner than I thought. I wanted to replace my C300 with a larger car, and what better way to do it than with a legit big car. Plus, I miss my Lincolns I’ve had in the past. But....will it still be on sale???

And me over here is thinking about selling my C300 coupe and getting another 80's Lincoln. *Shrug*

Haven’t seen that sign on that building in a long time. FYI, that is the old headquarters building, now being repurposed into a mixed use commercial building. The new headquarters is around the corner, still in Akron. I work equidistant from both buildings.

I’ve said it before and I’ll say it again. I think fuel economy mandates are stupid, and people will buy what they want and need. The government shouldn’t force manufacturers and, alas, people into what they buy. Mercedes owners simply do not want 4 cyl E-Class’s and six-cylinder S-Class’s. Back in 2007 when gas was…