drgnrbrn316
drgnrbrn316
drgnrbrn316

I’m not sure who I support in this. On the one hand, HH is providing a lot of content for free and raking in quite a bit of money doing it. None of that money is going towards licenses or people working on the content, which concerns me. But, HH was looking for a way to go legit, so maybe the guy isn’t all bad.

As a white guy who enjoyed the animated movie, I agree that it doesn’t really matter who they cast in the part. Ariel was never defined by her race outside of the fact that she was a mermaid. There’s no logical reason why a mermaid should be one color over another.

If the feature was disabled for stability reasons, why not say as much at the time? Or just delay the update until it was ready?

The problem with this is that Trump doesn’t care. He comes from the wealthy elite who don’t really consider how much something costs. If he wants a game console, he doesn’t really recognize the price, he just gets one. So if it costs more, he won’t notice nor care. On top of that, two of the three companies are

Exactly. They won’t be able to make both sides happy without creating two separate cutscenes for every scene in the game: one voiced and one with the over the top gestures. Anything less than that will give both sides an inferior product. Either fans will be wondering what’s going on when a couple characters just

So, are they using voice actors or just audio from the movies? I’m kind of on the fence about the voices vs no voices argument. There was something charming about them being able to communicate the movies without voice acting, but there were games that were negatively impacted by the choice. Lego Batman’s plot was a

Lego Marvel Superheroes 1 is my favorite, easily. It wasn’t bound to retell a particular story, allowing them a bit more creative freedom. It was filled with characters, allowing you to play as a diverse group of Marvel’s heroes and villains, including some characters you wouldn’t really expect to see. (one area

This looks interesting, but I have a couple reservations that would need to be addressed before I rush out and buy it day one.

If the unwitting participants of this show are offered a big paycheck at the end and perhaps an actual job somewhere, then this could be an interesting premise. If we’re just laughing at a bunch of desperate people trying to find work and only finding a carrot on a stick followed by ridicule and unemployment, then

Either this will be the latest business venture for the players in GTA Online (though I don’t really see what new thing it could offer that isn’t already done by the Nightclubs, Bunkers, Hangars, Clubhouses, Corporations, etc), with an incredibly high investment price, or now that Rockstar has figured out how to put

In general, I’m inclined to assume Activision is in the wrong without reading any of the article. Having read the article though, I’m still inclined to think Activision is in the wrong. By their logic, I should be allowed to make my own Call of Duty game and have it look identical to their own product because freedom

How does anyone defend this obvious unconstitutionality? In what way is this not a dictatorship already?

That makes sense, but I imagine there’s also a little of what we’re seeing in America mixed in. People in general love movies, but they connect more with movies they can relate with. America is finally getting to a point where we don’t rely solely upon a bunch of white guys to solve our problems, so people here are

Epic still has a long way to go before they win me over. Everything they’ve done so far reeks of spectacle rather than substance. Promises of bigger cuts for developers is nice and all, except they’re having massive sales and giving away games, which suggest that the developer isn’t actually getting that big of a cut.

To play with my friends without having to deal with other players. That’s also my problem with GTA Online. They have private lobbies, but won’t let you do anything of value unless you’re in a public lobby. The fact that so many people are working out ways to join a public lobby without having anyone else in there

I’m still not going back until there are private lobbies.

But given that Mjolnir was destroyed at that point, there’s hardly any reason for him to ask Steve if he could have lifted it.

I don’t know that this would be considered pulling a JK Rowling. Age of Ultron showed Cap was at least worthy enough to budge Mjolnir, so the groundwork is already there for him to eventually wield it. Seeing that they weren’t involved in the making of that movie, any thoughts they have on him having been worthy all

I was a bit surprised to see a Republican was spearheading this initiative.

but it sounds more like they were only “for the gamers” as long as it served their interests