drbigbeef

9/30/19

1) your reading comprehension is garbage. Literally quoting from my post above “I *have* admitted that I might be wrong”

9/30/19

Agreed. Access to “everything” by “everyone” isn’t as awesome as it sounds.

9/30/19

“According to the Southern Poverty Law Center, the number of active hate groups operating in the United States in 2018 was 1,020; twenty years ago, it was 457. “

9/30/19

How do you draw the line between a booster giving a recruit a bagful of money (against NCAA rules) and a used car dealer (also a booster) offering a recruit an endorsement deal (which apparently would be within these new rules)?

9/30/19

1) I have not shown you all my research so you have no idea what I have an have not done. I could similarly say “You are only parroting what CNN told you back in 2012" when in reality you probably have more info that that.

9/30/19

I *have* admitted that I might be wrong, and in fact my opinion of this whole mess has changed greatly as I’ve done more and more research (so in fact, I admitted I was wrong). I’m quite confident in my current position, however.

9/27/19

1) I am citing my arguments. They happen to partially agree with me (I actually disagree with them on a lot, especially Clemente)

9/27/19

1) Based on what? You didn’t provide any citations. Why? Well, because we have wildly conflicting dates from all of the principle parties. The OAG originally determined it happened in 2002, which conveniently fell just under the statute of limitations for charging. And then determined it actually happened in 2001 (but…

9/27/19

1) Please provide evidence (not your opinion) of something that Zeigler has published that is incorrect. I agree with you that his delivery is awful, but he knows more about this case than anyone else.

9/27/19

1) Please show me where I cited Thornburg or Clemente.

9/27/19

1) Freeh is a “gun for hire.” Nothing more. He’ll write a report that says whatever the guy with the checkbook wants it to say.

9/27/19

You are so full of shit. You keep harping on the convictions and then say “ Paterno’s public reputation (or anyone’s) will not be established in the court system.” What a two faced fuck you are. Eat a bag of dicks.

9/27/19

1) I actually disagree with Zeigler on a number of things, but he also knows way more facts about this case that you do.

9/27/19

Morals are not absolute. Your morals do not have to equal my morals. I’m talking about laws. No laws were broken. Full stop.

9/27/19

He punished no one (in any meaningful way) for Ruby Ridge. That’s a failure of leadership.

9/27/19

1) I assure you I know way more about this case than you do, so calling me ignorant is hysterical. While I agree that this is not how plea bargains SHOULD work, in this case, the OAG was wildly corrupt. They had to save face because they risked not getting any convictions of the administrators which would have been a…

9/26/19

Right, and he was responsible for the investigation into what went wrong, which he botched. You are truly a mouth breather.

9/26/19

1) I assure you that’s not what happened. The prosecution thought all along that someone would flip on Spanier. No one did because they were not willing to lie. The OAG’s hail mary was to offer Curley and Schultz no jail time, which they agreed to, but then the OAG didn’t like that they said in court and they pulled…

9/26/19

If a cover up isn’t illegal, then why are we talking about it? I’m trying my best to cover up my disdain for you, but that’s not a criminal offense.

9/26/19

While I agree that not all conspiracies are cover ups (e.g. you can have conspiracy to commit murder), all cover ups are (by definition) a conspiracy.