If you actually care about this, please listen:

“that you would waste your valuable time with little old me”

Gleeful? Hardly. Please notice the time lag discrepancies between when I post and when you post. I usually respond weeks after you write something profane about me. You respond to me within a day. I picture you eating Cheetos and constantly hitting refresh, hoping I will validate your pathetic existence by taking time…

1. I fill any holes I have in my life with science and friends. You apparently fill your holes (LOL) with internet stalking.

1. Correct. Never said he was. That would be weird (also, there is no god)

You are more detached from reality than Trump and his QAnon buddies. Literally none of what you just said is true. Very sad. Perhaps if therapy isn’t working for you, you should consider pharmacological alternatives to be able to deal with the sadness that is your life.

Update: “Sad internet man remains sad because he cannot harm intelligent man he has become obsessed with”. LOL. Get help. 

Headline “Sad Internet Stalker is Sad and Stalks Intelligent Man”. No film at 11 because it would make everyone sad. Please get help.  Or go fuck yourself.  I don’t really care which.

You are the one who re-started this argument (after what a year??), not me. You just admitted you come back from time to time to pick fights (on the internet). Sounds like you are the sad, joyless person who is divorced from reality. Hope you find some peace.

My response isn’t angry. I’m sad for you and hope you learn how to critically think some day. Also, please stop stalking people on the internet. I’ll be off enjoying my life. Grow up.

Your refutations are based on incorrect facts. Most of what you just wrote is incorrect, so I’m not even going to waste my time on you. My final comment will be twofold: 1) There is no such thing as a soul, and if you believe there is then you are a bigger ignoramus than I thought 2) My morals are based around truth…

I’m not going to re-explain the facts of this case to you. I wasted too much time filling in the gaps in your knowledge months (over a year?) ago. You can believe whatever you like, but it is not supported by the facts (either of the case or of the law). I hope the rest of your apparently empty (otherwise, why bring…

[I have not read the book and am only talking about the show] I agree with you given the ending that it WAS a show about psychopathy. But the “whodunit” tangents that they went off on distracted from that (IMHO). Perhaps it would have been a stronger show if they had done away with those tangents and focused on the…

You remain painfully ignorant about almost every single aspect of this case (the judge being a PSU fan is the funniest thing I’ve heard all week). Wallow in your ignorance, piggy.

If they don’t hear it en banc, then it is a travesty of justice. But that happens all the time in this country; most people are enlightened enough not to celebrate it.  Enjoy being an ignorant prick.

Trust me, I already knew about this ruling which is very clearly un-Constitutional (and the judge who wrote the opinion is buddy buddy with the same corrupt folks in PA). It will get over turned at the the next appeal - don’t worry.

The finale was unsatisfying. If the story was about how seemingly good people can really be horrible people, then series needed to focus on that (e.g. the gradual uncovering of the lies, the affair, the love child, the financial issues, the job loss, the dead sister, the lack of empathy). Instead the series kept…

“especially since we haven’t yet been offered any signs that Jonathan may be innocent”

I just finished watching this series and have mixed feelings about it.  I thought it was well acted and setting (US Army base in Italy) is an interesting choice that works really well in terms of putting the characters in a bubble where no one really fits in.  However, I didn’t enjoy most of the episodes primarily…

Also, Redford’s deadpan response is just genius.