the rehearsal reviews were also recaps. I'm just here for the comments but should really be going elsewhere for reviews.

It’s not even really an accurate recap...I’m absolutely sure that the Maesters present the choice to Viserys as saving the child at the expense of the mother...or losing BOTH mother and child. Not, as the recap states, saving the child OR the mother.

As for this article, it says review but all I saw is a recap

I thought it was really good. Much more like early GoT then later GoT. If there was another episode out I’d be watching it now.

And yet he hasn’t reduced his $246 million salary by a single penny. I’ll believe he’s taking this debt seriously when he starts slashing that.

To be more fair, even if “it was just a joke” is a cover, and the DM was actually sent in spite, it’s still a pretty tame statement and a pretty major overreaction by the reviewer.

Exactly. I’ve seen the movie and, outside of a brief pool scene at the beginning, Stenberg is the only one with actual cleavage. So it makes sense to feel personally targeted.

It appears that we have Karens in the comment section as well.

Literally nothing wrong with Stenberg’s message.

Why should she be the one required to go offline? What you’re suggesting is that the shitty transphobes should be allowed to decide who gets to be online.

The only person with visible cleavage (admittedly from the pictures I have seen) is Amandla. And as a someone with big boobs, it is very easy to show cleavage. It’s kind of shitty to exist as someone with a bigger chest and then be criticized as your movie being an advertisement for cleavage. It’s the same thing women…

Did you read past the first paragraph?

Lesbian or not, it’s clear the author of the review is using her white womanhood to try and become the victim when messaged by a black actress she wrote a review on. 

So the reviewer makes a reductive comment about how the movie is just an advertisement for cleavage, a star from that movie sends a private message joking that if the reviewer had paid more attention to the film than the cleavage, maybe she would have gotten more out of it, and somehow the reviewer is a victim?

yes there is, in the same way that people often say “we’re going to a straight wedding”

I’ve spent a combined 9 hours on reddit and twitter today, and this is still the stupidest fucking comment I’ve seen.

They should make a movie about how their Gen X nihilism and “triggering is a virtue” zeitgeist helped lead directly to Trumpism and the reemergence of fascism in America.

I actually don’t want DC to follow the MCU formula tho lol. I don’t want crossovers or team-ups or an interconnected, overarching story, and I don’t want a Kevin Fiege type overseeing the whole thing. I literally just want each hero to get their own series of movies that are made by passionate individuals, that aren’t…

Situations like this are always fascinating.

I legitimately miss the AT&T era. That says something.