She and her husband are bottom feeder "opposition research" political consultants. This Mars Mission may be one of the least ridiculous things about her.

Well, among lots of other reasons, none of the commercial space tourist flights - which just involve getting shot up in a rocket and coming down - have happened despite billions of dollars and lots of interest. So, let's at least defer this conversation until Virgin or one of the others actually sends humans into the…

None of these people have even attempted their journey, nor is there any real likelihood of it happening soon. Right now it is just PR. So no, they are not (yet) heroes or pioneers. Maybe in the future, but not now. Also, you are aware this is a one-way trip, right?

That dude was actually in space. None of these folks are, yet. When they strap themselves to a rocket on a one-way death trip to Mars, then I will consider calling them heroes. For now, I admire them as dreamers, nothing more.

Let me clue you in on something...there's no way in hell Sonia is doing this either. There is no manned Mars mission.

Lol. None of these people are going to Mars. None of them are heroes (unless they did something else heroic). If anything, they are seriously delusional.

Depends on the language of the ToS and Faker's contract with Azubu, but possibly. Although fraud requires scienter, or knowledge that something was fraudulent. If Faker thought he was entering into a legit contract for something he owned, then he likely can't be found guilty of fraud. I must admit though, I am basing…

It is far from obvious. The issue is not whether Faker or Azubu are hurt in any way, rather if they have a legally protectable interest in anything that is being violated. As I understand it, neither Faker nor Azubu have an exclusive right to the live-stream. Therefore, neither can grant to anyone else something that…

A little bit of green, a bit of the blue stuff, and some yellow on the side.

Sharks get equity, upside. Kickstart donors get baubles, if they are lucky. Agreed that both Sharks and Donors should be investing in solid companies, but Kevin O'Leary is looking for a licensing deal, not necessarily a company that can deliver a finished product.

There is no money, otherwise the company wouldn't need to ask for $30 from each donor. Suing the company would be useless, only ensuring you'd never see your controller. But the company has handled this horribly and really should find some way to make it up to the donors, even if it is a promise for the future. I…

He has been fattening up to more closely resemble his grandfather

What a terrible fucking contract. If the quoted language is correct, "incarceration," not "conviction of a felony." Incarceration can be defined as an jailing or imprisonment. Including the kind that comes before you have been even charged with a crime. "Suspension by the team?" This was always a huge loophole for…

Yep, the statement from State Media reads exactly as you would expect it to, minus a few "glorious" references perhaps. Although we did get "splendid" and "magnificent."

One can only imagine what those notebooks contain. Comic gold, I'm sure

"How much longer till he leaves?"

As a matter of fact, he is a standup, guy.

That's how you know he is a real doctor

Somebody called for doctor, yes?

It also fucks with men's expectations of what a real woman actually is