Are you’re saying the habitual drinker at .08 as well as the nondrinker at .08 ought not to be driving?

At .10 it was a public safety thing. At .08 and .06 it’s a cash grab, plain and simple.

“One controlled test after another has determined that at .08 your ability is impaired without regard to your status as a first-time drinker or hardened alcoholic.”

It worked out okay once upon a time... before the Eternal September.

That is a good point, a habitual alcohol consumer could potentially pass the impairment test and would not be subjected to further testing.

Are they trying to measure impairment, or trying to measure BAC? They are not exactly the same thing. Habitual drinkers do seem to handle higher BAC with less impairment. BAC is easily and reliably measurable, but impairment is not quite the same.

“(For what it’s worth, our own Jason Torchinsky once opened for Carlin a few years back. I thought that was cool, too.)“

Go price out a 10 channel DVR and look at the price difference between the framerates.

Truly the mark of meh: they made soooo many of these, and yet you never see them anymore.

It’s a camera watching the front door of a business, or gas pump, or something else like that. It just happened to catch a glimpse of the vehicle so they’re showing you what they can.

“The entire store is terrified as we unlock the door to take the alternator from him and hand him his cash refund.”

It’s not confusing to the rest of us.

I use my leafblower to clear light snow off the driveway, clean out my gutters, dry off the cars after I wash them...

Do you rake them like some sort of savage, or did you cut down all the trees in your yard?

Foxtrot Alpha!

“I was not a chick at the time”

“Nobody better bitch about the vertically-oriented video”

Deez_the_nuts?

“The 2008 Honda Civic EX is a perfectly fine car for normal and regular humans.”