But the debt ratio for L Brands is at 0...so that’s not the reason.

You seem pretty invested in negating cultural factors in the fall of a fashion brand. I wonder why.

This is the fundamental ridiculousness of VS encapsulated.  Make bras that make tits look bigger, but don’t make bras for those with actual big tits.  

If you’re paying for it, it’s advertising. The reach is irrelevant. 

Glad to see you diversifying your food tastes, Tomato.

Ah, Victoria’s Secret. *smh*

“Instead, he will have to scrape by on health insurance coverage that his own party is trying to decimate.”

one down, most to go.

Google “joke”

Technically fiancée is just the female equivalent of fiancé, but since fiancé is the proper term you’re not required to gender it. It’s not commonly gendered in modern usage, and hasn’t been for some time now.

Don’t these people have any handlers who actually vet the people and groups they speak with? I used to line up media opps for the top people in the companies I worked for, and if I didn’t recognize the outlet or the organization, it was my job to make sure that they were legit. Not hard. 

Look. Stanning for a guy with this rap sheet is nagl.

How about some good news?

Paraphrasing from a dirty hippy commenting on the Huckabee dining inconvenience:

I thought I’d add a new take on a fan favorite.

On the other hand, she could go fuck herself.

I see your point, but I think this situation is completely different than refusing service to someone because they are gay, or Black. Denying service to an entire category of people just because of the way they were born - like being gay, or being Black - is VERY different than being held accountable as an individual…

I feel like the Supreme Court just ruled that refusing to serve people because we disagree with their beliefs is exactly what we can do.  If this is what they fought for, then this is what they get.