dod2000
DenzilOfDojima
dod2000

Taylor had previously mentioned that her Bayonetta 1 & 2 sessions took around 2 weeks total which adds some additional context (I have no idea what constitutes an acceptable rate for VAs). I’d be interested to know what she got for those just as some kind of baseline for comparison. If there is some shady business

Not sure how the ability to crouch or jump would improve the game. It wasn’t designed with either of these actions in mind and they would be therefore redundant. Unless you’re suggesting the game would better if it were completely redesigned to accommodate these elements? Maybe not a bad idea considering the games

I played it for about 2.5 hours or so (which I believe is roughly half the average running time) and, outside of its artistic merits and some nice sound design, Scorn is a supremely boring videogame. It’s a walking sim with some rudimentary combat and puzzles solving taped on and I was shocked at how unengaging each

Isn’t the headline a bit of a misnomer? The points are a reward scheme and as such only a by-product of your Steam purchase (or given as an award from other users), you aren’t actually paying for the points and therefore the conversion of points to digital items isn’t really a sale. For sure you could play semantics

Apparently it’s costing Netflix 1 billion rupees to produce. That’s nearly 5 thousand usd or 4.5 thousand gbp.

Fully agree, when the Superhot devs altered their game I was against the complete removal of something that was part of the original artistic vision. I’m glad they made it optional and gave players a heads up, which is exactly the happy medium. SLZ should consider doing the same.

Ever since Bluepoint remade Demon’s Souls, people have been waiting for a Bloodborne announcement in the same vein. That noise won’t be stopping anytime soon. Personally I’d be happy if they released an official framerate patch for the original on current gen hardware (unlikely).

Nintendo’s legal team: “sniff, sniff....sniiiiiff...HUUUNH??”

Aging like a fine wine...and just as pricey

The fact that Cyberpunk overpromised and underdelivered didn’t make it any less of a decent experience with the right hardware. I played at launch on PC and sunk around 60 mostly enjoyable hours; there were a litany of bugs, some amazing narrative moments, janky driving, likable characters, a beautiful world that

Was he as motivated to address it before he lost? Genuine question btw, I don’t follow Magnus especially closely so I would be curious to know if he was doing anything to promote more measures prior to the loss.

A saucy situation indeed

It’s a great discussion point, though it’s worth mentioning that GTAs protagonists are mostly presented as anti-heroes at best, villains at worst and in a clearly satirical manner, while the Watchdog series unambiguously positions the protagonists as heroic in stories that take themselves relatively seriously. It’s

How about them? Of course these things suck if they are indeed occurring (the specifics you mention still being supposition on your part). If you think this guy gave such deep thought or consideration to his actions before doing this, I think you give him far too much credit. I still maintain that he’s dishonest,

On their own? Not necessarily. But maybe you have your own opinion on what constitutes a “scumbag”. I’ve heard the term applied to murderers, sex offenders, drug dealers and now NDA breaching YouTubers. Maybe we need a measurable scale of scumbaggery so we can more accurately apply these terms? Or we can just agree

I’m not arguing against the right or wrong of it, I already pointed out that the guy has clear deficiencies in regards to his principles. But there has to be some perspective right? I simply disagreed with the OPs language, language that, to me a least, conveys the image of a more egregious act and has been applied to

A dishonest interpretation, seems you and he share a common characteristic. Why on earth is it in quotations?

He did, and it was a dick move; he’s clearly not the most principled guy around. On the scale of reprehensible acts by Youtube personalities in the gaming sphere, I’d still rate him as sitting comfortably in pre-scumbag status. Just my perspective.

I wouldn’t go that far. Dishonest and untrustworthy sure, still it’s hard to feel any sympathy for the companies he broke his legal agreements with. Ubisoft and their 67 new AC games can fuck right off.

They could be saying “patently false” because it’s clear that security was just doing their job rather than being racially motivated. That would still make sense even if they didn’t know she was white. The fact that opinion is split (though clearly in favour of ignorance) demonstrates a lack of clarity in the post.